Zizou Bergs vs Jaime FariaWimbledon Round of 64

Wimbledon · ATP · Round of 64
#37ATP
1808ELO
1712Grass ELO
$995kYTD
$4.0MCAREER
27 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWWLLL
3 — 1
Sets
Thursday, 2 July 2026 ·
grass
Court 15 · 2nd on
#98ATP
1735ELO
1624Grass ELO
$531kYTD
$1.4MCAREER
22 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWLWLWWW
Bergs Z.
7-6 4-6 6-2 6-3
Faria J.
Bergs Z.
784663
Faria J.
666231

Zizou Bergs came through a 40-game battle to beat Jaime Faria 7-6 4-6 6-2 6-3 in the Wimbledon round of 64.

Key context

  • Set 2, game 1: Jaime Faria broke serve.
  • Momentum: Zizou Bergs won seven games in a row.
  • Set 4, game 2: Zizou Bergs broke serve.
  • Pressure points: Zizou Bergs converted 6 of 15 break points; Jaime Faria converted 4 of 12 break points.

Pressure & serve by court

Bergs Z.
Faria J.
Break points won
6/15
4/12
Break points saved
8/12
9/15

Break points from this match. Serve-by-court shows the share of service points won from each side of the court; the court side alternates every point.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Bergs Z.serving84% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Faria J.

Faria J.serving90% hold

wins 70% of points on serve vs Bergs Z.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
1st serve in·Even
57%
58%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
52%
Service points won·Even
64%
64%
Return points won·Even
36%
40%
Break points saved·Even
63%
59%
Aces / match·Slight edge
7.0
5.7
Double faults / match·Slight edge
4.1
4.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (25 vs 42). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
69
54
Break points saved·Clear edge
95
76
Break points won·Even
21
22
Deciding sets·Slight edge
92
81
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
91
76

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Win Probability

Pre-match · updated 11:21 UTC
Bergs Z.55%
Faria J.45%
Toss-up
50–58%
Slight edge
58–67%
Clear favourite
67–80%
Strong favourite
80%+

Toss-up · Too close to call

Calibrated model · 65% favourite accuracy (2025–26, out-of-sample). Probability is a statistical estimate, not a certainty. How it works.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
6.9
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.2+14 Grass Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.8Grass Elo 1604
5.6Overall Elo 1748
ELO gap
4.4Overall Elo 1696
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0No prior meetings
7.26 of last 10 on grass
Surface form
8.48 of last 10 on grass
9.06-match win streak
Win streak
7.04-match win streak
Fatigue & Travel
0.03 three-setters in 14 days
3-set count
4.02 three-setters in 14 days
Context
6.0Reached the R128 here last year
Defending pts
6.0Reached final qualifying here last year

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Freshness·Clear edge
74
88

Bergs Z.: 8 days rest · 4 matches (14d) · Faria J.: 10 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Weather
24°CClear
Wind 19 km/hHumidity 42%
R128
R64
R32
R16
Quarter-finals
Semi-finals
Final