Win probability

Friday, 3 July 2026

17 matches selected · 3 tournaments · model last ran 17:50 UTC

Umpiry rates 17 matches on Friday, 3 July 2026. The closest is Yosuke Watanuki v Jack Kennedy at 57 % — the model’s most uncertain call of the day. The most one-sided is Jannik Sinner v Jenson Brooksby at 97 %. Probabilities come from a per-tour model trained on Elo, surface Elo, recent serve and return form and layoff.

Rated matches · ordered closest first
TimeTournamentRoundMatchProbabilityVerdictH2H
13:15Cary
CHALLENGER · hard
QFWatanuki Y.Kennedy J.57 %43 %Toss-up1–0
16:00Wimbledon
WTA · grass
R32Krejcikova B.Bartunkova N.67 %33 %Slight edge1–0
15:00Wimbledon
ATP · grass
R32Davidovich Fokina A.Fucsovics M.68 %32 %Clear favourite2–1
12:10Wimbledon
WTA · grass
R32Jovic I.Alexandrova E.70 %30 %Clear favourite1–1
10:05Wimbledon
WTA · grass
R32Bencic B.Kalinskaya A.70 %30 %Clear favourite5–1
10:10Wimbledon
ATP · grass
R32Fonseca J.Safiullin R.82 %18 %Strong favourite0–1
13:55Wimbledon
ATP · grass
R32Paul T.Hurkacz H.83 %17 %Strong favourite4–2
12:10Wimbledon
WTA · grass
R32Osaka N.Kasatkina D.83 %17 %Strong favourite4–0
16:30Wimbledon
WTA · grass
R32Muchova K.Sawangkaew M.87 %13 %Strong favourite1–0
13:20Wimbledon
ATP · grass
R32Medvedev D.Lennard Struff J.89 %11 %Strong favourite9–3
12:40Wimbledon
ATP · grass
R32Djokovic N.Rinderknech A.92 %8 %Strong favourite1–0
12:40Wimbledon
WTA · grass
R32Pegula J.Bouzas Maneiro J.92 %8 %Strong favourite2–0
16:20Wimbledon
WTA · grass
R32Gauff C.Liu C.94 %6 %Strong favourite3–0
16:15Wimbledon
WTA · grass
R32Sabalenka A.Ostapenko J.94 %6 %Strong favourite4–1
18:10Wimbledon
ATP · grass
R32Auger Aliassime F.Zheng M.94 %6 %Strong favourite1–0
12:40Wimbledon
ATP · grass
R32Jodar R.Mochizuki S.95 %5 %Strong favourite0–1
13:40Wimbledon
ATP · grass
R32Sinner J.Brooksby J.97 %3 %Strong favourite2–0

How to read this

Each row gives the model’s probability that the favourite wins, and the verdict says the same thing in words. Rows are ordered by how close the model thinks the match is, so the top of the table is where it is least sure. A 70 % favourite losing is not a broken model — it is the 30 %. Probabilities are not odds and take no account of any market.

How often the model has been right

Umpiry win-probability model accuracy by tour family, measured on the predictions the model made
TourCorrect
ATP / WTA66 %
Challenger (men)64 %
Challenger (women)68 %
ITF (men)66 %
ITF (women)64 %

Measured on the predictions the model actually made, not on a backtest — see Methodology.

Yesterday

Thursday, 2 July 2026 · 20 matches

Favourites won

15 / 20

Model expected

15.5

The model expected 15.5 favourites to win; 15 did. See yesterday’s page.

Biggest shock, last 7 days

1 Jul
Wimbledon
ATP · grass
R64

Surprise score

89

Questions

How is the probability calculated?
A separate model for each tour, trained on Elo, surface-specific Elo, recent serve and return form and time since the player’s last match. It runs several times a day; the time of the last run is at the top of this page.
How often is the model right?
We publish it. The table above gives the hit rate for each tour family, measured on the predictions the model actually made — see Methodology for how it is computed.
Why are the closest matches at the top?
Rows are ordered by distance from 50 %, so the table opens where the model is least sure. “Most one-sided” reverses the order and groups the rows by tournament.
Is this a betting tip?
No. The page shows a model’s probability and how often that model has been right. There are no odds, no comparison with a market and no suggested stake.