Win probability

Wednesday, 24 June 2026

20 matches selected · 2 tournaments · model last ran 16:50 UTC

Umpiry rates 20 matches on Wednesday, 24 June 2026. The closest is Moez Echargui v Keegan Smith at 52 % — the model’s most uncertain call of the day. The most one-sided is Robin Montgomery v Elvina Kalieva at 84 %. Probabilities come from a per-tour model trained on Elo, surface Elo, recent serve and return form and layoff.

Rated matches · ordered closest first
TimeTournamentRoundMatchProbabilityVerdictH2H
14:25Wimbledon
ATP · grass
SFEchargui M.Smith K.52 %48 %Toss-up1–1
13:40Wimbledon
ATP · grass
SFHolmgren A.Kym J.53 %47 %Toss-up0–1
13:15Wimbledon
WTA · grass
SFDay K.Andreeva E.54 %46 %Toss-up1–1
14:55Wimbledon
ATP · grass
SFPellegrino A.Boyer T.54 %46 %Toss-up0–2
10:10Wimbledon
WTA · grass
SFSawangkaew M.Stoiana M.55 %45 %Toss-up2–0
16:15Wimbledon
ATP · grass
SFMayot H.Moro Canas A.55 %45 %Toss-up0–1
13:40Wimbledon
ATP · grass
SFGojo B.Smith C.55 %45 %Toss-up1–2
14:15Wimbledon
ATP · grass
SFDjere L.Zheng M.57 %43 %Toss-up0–1
17:50Wimbledon
WTA · grass
SFTimofeeva M.Podrez V.57 %43 %Toss-up1–0
13:15Wimbledon
ATP · grass
SFMcdonald M.Carballes Baena R.57 %43 %Toss-up2–0
13:15Wimbledon
WTA · grass
SFCrawley F.Riera J.60 %40 %Slight edge1–0
10:10Wimbledon
ATP · grass
SFEvans D.Schoolkate T.60 %40 %Slight edge0–1
13:45Wimbledon
ATP · grass
SFGaston H.Cina F.63 %37 %Slight edge1–0
10:10Wimbledon
ATP · grass
SFOnclin G.Mochizuki S.71 %29 %Clear favourite1–1
13:50Wimbledon
WTA · grass
SFKawa K.Stefanini L.72 %28 %Clear favourite1–1
13:15Wimbledon
ATP · grass
SFBlanch D.Sweeny D.74 %26 %Clear favourite0–1
15:25Wimbledon
WTA · grass
SFZhu L.Sarah Rakotomanga Rajaonah T.74 %26 %Clear favourite1–0
10:10Wimbledon
ATP · grass
SFHeide G.Mejia N.77 %23 %Clear favourite1–1
15:35Wimbledon
ATP · grass
SFWoo Kwon S.Gea A.78 %22 %Clear favourite1–1
17:25Wimbledon
WTA · grass
SFMontgomery R.Kalieva E.84 %16 %Strong favourite2–2

How to read this

Each row gives the model’s probability that the favourite wins, and the verdict says the same thing in words. Rows are ordered by how close the model thinks the match is, so the top of the table is where it is least sure. A 70 % favourite losing is not a broken model — it is the 30 %. Probabilities are not odds and take no account of any market.

How often the model has been right

Umpiry win-probability model accuracy by tour family, measured on the predictions the model made
TourCorrect
ATP / WTA66 %
Challenger (men)64 %
Challenger (women)68 %
ITF (men)66 %
ITF (women)64 %

Measured on the predictions the model actually made, not on a backtest — see Methodology.

Yesterday

Tuesday, 23 June 2026 · 15 matches

Favourites won

10 / 15

Model expected

9.1

The model expected 9.1 favourites to win; 10 did. See yesterday’s page.

Biggest shock, last 7 days

23 Jun
Eastbourne
ATP · grass
R32

Surprise score

88

Questions

How is the probability calculated?
A separate model for each tour, trained on Elo, surface-specific Elo, recent serve and return form and time since the player’s last match. It runs several times a day; the time of the last run is at the top of this page.
How often is the model right?
We publish it. The table above gives the hit rate for each tour family, measured on the predictions the model actually made — see Methodology for how it is computed.
Why are the closest matches at the top?
Rows are ordered by distance from 50 %, so the table opens where the model is least sure. “Most one-sided” reverses the order and groups the rows by tournament.
Is this a betting tip?
No. The page shows a model’s probability and how often that model has been right. There are no odds, no comparison with a market and no suggested stake.