Win probability

Wednesday, 1 July 2026

20 matches selected · 2 tournaments · model last ran 17:50 UTC

Umpiry rates 20 matches on Wednesday, 1 July 2026. The closest is Arthur Rinderknech v Martin Damm at 51 % — the model’s most uncertain call of the day. The most one-sided is Jessica Pegula v Sara Sorribes Tormo at 96 %. Probabilities come from a per-tour model trained on Elo, surface Elo, recent serve and return form and layoff.

Rated matches · ordered closest first
TimeTournamentRoundMatchProbabilityVerdictH2H
13:15Wimbledon
ATP · grass
R64Rinderknech A.Damm M.51 %49 %Toss-up1–1
13:00Wimbledon
ATP · grass
R64Safiullin R.Van De Zandschulp B.55 %45 %Toss-up2–0
11:35Wimbledon
ATP · grass
R128Molcan A.Altmaier D.58 %42 %Slight edge3–0
15:00Wimbledon
WTA · grass
R64Siniakova K.Bartunkova N.62 %38 %Slight edge0–1
12:25Wimbledon
WTA · grass
R64Yastremska D.Bouzas Maneiro J.65 %35 %Slight edge1–3
10:10Wimbledon
WTA · grass
R64Sawangkaew M.Parks A.67 %33 %Clear favourite2–0
16:55Wimbledon
WTA · grass
R64Alexandrova E.Tararudee L.69 %31 %Clear favourite1–0
10:10Wimbledon
ATP · grass
R64Tien L.Fucsovics M.74 %26 %Clear favourite0–1
13:40Wimbledon
WTA · grass
R64Kalinskaya A.Parry D.74 %26 %Clear favourite2–0
10:10Wimbledon
WTA · grass
R64Kasatkina D.Tjen J.75 %25 %Clear favourite1–0
11:45Wimbledon
ATP · grass
R128Cobolli F.Navone M.76 %24 %Clear favourite2–0
15:40Wimbledon
WTA · grass
R64Andreeva M.Krejcikova B.80 %20 %Clear favourite3–2
16:50Wimbledon
ATP · grass
R64Auger Aliassime F.Prizmic D.84 %16 %Strong favourite1–0
18:50Wimbledon
ATP · grass
R64Djokovic N.Tsitsipas S.86 %14 %Strong favourite13–2
12:35Wimbledon
WTA · grass
R64Muchova K.Zhang S.87 %13 %Strong favourite4–0
14:15Wimbledon
WTA · grass
R64Gauff C.Sierra S.91 %9 %Strong favourite3–0
13:15Wimbledon
ATP · grass
R64Medvedev D.Merida Aguilar D.92 %8 %Strong favourite1–0
12:10Wimbledon
WTA · grass
R64Sabalenka A.Kessler M.93 %7 %Strong favourite2–0
12:40Wimbledon
ATP · grass
R64Sinner J.Borges N.96 %4 %Strong favourite2–0
15:45Wimbledon
WTA · grass
R64Pegula J.Sorribes Tormo S.96 %4 %Strong favourite2–3

How to read this

Each row gives the model’s probability that the favourite wins, and the verdict says the same thing in words. Rows are ordered by how close the model thinks the match is, so the top of the table is where it is least sure. A 70 % favourite losing is not a broken model — it is the 30 %. Probabilities are not odds and take no account of any market.

How often the model has been right

Umpiry win-probability model accuracy by tour family, measured on the predictions the model made
TourCorrect
ATP / WTA66 %
Challenger (men)64 %
Challenger (women)68 %
ITF (men)66 %
ITF (women)64 %

Measured on the predictions the model actually made, not on a backtest — see Methodology.

Yesterday

Tuesday, 30 June 2026 · 20 matches

Favourites won

10 / 20

Model expected

13.9

The model expected 13.9 favourites to win; 10 did. See yesterday’s page.

Biggest shock, last 7 days

28 Jun
Milan
CHALLENGER · clay
SF

Surprise score

90

Questions

How is the probability calculated?
A separate model for each tour, trained on Elo, surface-specific Elo, recent serve and return form and time since the player’s last match. It runs several times a day; the time of the last run is at the top of this page.
How often is the model right?
We publish it. The table above gives the hit rate for each tour family, measured on the predictions the model actually made — see Methodology for how it is computed.
Why are the closest matches at the top?
Rows are ordered by distance from 50 %, so the table opens where the model is least sure. “Most one-sided” reverses the order and groups the rows by tournament.
Is this a betting tip?
No. The page shows a model’s probability and how often that model has been right. There are no odds, no comparison with a market and no suggested stake.