Thijs Boogaard vs Yibing Wu — s Hertogenbosch Round of 32

s Hertogenbosch · ATP · Round of 32

NEDWC

Thijs Boogaard

#525ATP

18 yrs · Right-handed

Last 10 · pre-match

LLLWWLWWLL

2 — 1

Sets

Wednesday, 10 June 2026 · 11:10

grass

COURT 2 · 1st on

CHN

Yibing Wu

#102ATP

1743ELO

1517Grass ELO

$472kYTD

$1.9MCAREER

26 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed

Last 10 · pre-match

LLLLWLWLWW

Boogaard T.

6-3 2-6 6-4

Wu Y.

Boogaard T.

6262

Wu Y.

3641

Thijs Boogaard broke serve in the third set to take control and defeat Yibing Wu 6-3 2-6 6-4 in the s Hertogenbosch round of 32.

Around the match

“I can learn a huge amount from those players.”
Boogaard T.libema-open.nl ↗
“It came as a bit of a surprise. I'd already heard I'd probably play qualifiers again, when I got a message from my agent that it was the main draw instead. I was then teased a bit, as if it would be reversed. But that was just a joke. I'm really happy and grateful for the chance I've been given.”
Boogaard T.libema-open.nl ↗

Quotes belong to their sources, linked above.

Key context

Set 1, game 3: A 13-point game with four deuces went Thijs Boogaard's way.
Pressure points: Thijs Boogaard converted 2 of 6 break points; Yibing Wu converted 2 of 8 break points.

Pressure & serve by court

Boogaard T.

Wu Y.

Break points won

2/6

2/8

Break points saved

6/8

4/6

Break points from this match. Serve-by-court shows the share of service points won from each side of the court; the court side alternates every point.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season

Boogaard T.serving81% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Wu Y.

Wu Y.serving82% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Boogaard T.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season

Boogaard T.Wu Y.

1st serve in·Even

62%

59%

1st serve points won·Even

68%

71%

2nd serve points won·Even

51%

53%

Service points won·Even

62%

64%

Return points won·Even

42%

40%

Break points saved·Even

58%

57%

Aces / match·Clear edge

2.0

3.8

Double faults / match·Slight edge

2.7

2.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (6 vs 27). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match

Boogaard T.

5.7

Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited

Wu Y.

5.0

Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited

Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)

Form & Matchup

5.0No prior meetings

H2H

5.0No prior meetings

Surface form

1.61 of last 5 on grass

0.0Lost last 2

Win streak

0.0

Fatigue & Travel

3-set count

7.01 three-setter in 14 days

7.0Home country · 1/2 here

Country comfort

7.0Hard → Grass

Surface transition

3.0Clay → Grass

Context

6.0Reached qualifying here last year

Defending pts

5.0Didn't play here last year

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.