Marc Polmans vs Alexis Galarneau — Chicago CH Round of 32

Chicago CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Marc Polmans
AUS
Marc Polmans
#344ATP
1449ELO
1414Hard ELO
29 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLLLWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 22 July 2024
hard
Alexis Galarneau
CAN5
Alexis Galarneau
#158ATP
1593ELO
1548Hard ELO
$166kYTD
$825kCAREER
27 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLWLWWL
Polmans M.
2-6 7-6 6-4
Galarneau A.
Polmans M.
27762
Galarneau A.
66541

Marc Polmans defeated Alexis Galarneau 2-6 7-6 6-4 in the Chicago CH round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Alexis Galarneau came in ranked #158, defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Polmans M.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Galarneau A.

Galarneau A.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Polmans M.

Serve advantage — Galarneau A.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Polmans M.Galarneau A.
1st serve in·Slight edge
66%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
51%
Service points won·Even
61%
61%
Return points won·Even
37%
40%
Break points saved·Even
60%
60%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.2
3.1
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.9
3.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (78 vs 158). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Polmans M.Galarneau A.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
23
28
Break points saved·Even
79
79
Break points won·Slight edge
10
16
Deciding sets·Slight edge
31
22
Tiebreaks·Dominant
24
61

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Polmans M.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Galarneau A.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
3.2Hard Elo 1414
Surface ELO
6.8+134 Hard Elo edge
3.2Overall Elo 1449
ELO gap
6.8Overall Elo 1593
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
4.0
Surface form
5.2
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
5.0
Minutes 14d
7.6
4.0
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
6.0
7.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Polmans M.Galarneau A.
Freshness·Dominant
100
59

Polmans M.: 21 days rest · Galarneau A.: 3 days rest · 4 matches, 113 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Diallo G.
Yunchaokete B.[6]
6-37-63
Semi-finals
Diallo G.
Fearnley J.
6-26-3
Yunchaokete B.[6]
Tien L.
6-47-5
Quarter-finals
Fearnley J.
Holt B.
6-36-2
Diallo G.
Krueger M.
6-36-2
Yunchaokete B.[6]
Grenier H.[3]
6-26-796-1
Tien L.
Hong S.[8]
6-36-1
R16
Hong S.[8]
Broom C.
6-36-746-4
Fearnley J.
Atmane T.[1]
6-21-67-63
Holt B.
Polmans M.
6-47-64
Diallo G.
Fonseca J.
7-616-1
Krueger M.
Sekulic P.
6-46-2
Yunchaokete B.[6]
Jubb P.
6-36-3
Grenier H.[3]
Basavareddy N.
6-46-0
Tien L.
Mayo A.
6-36-746-3
R32
Broom C.
Shimabukuro S.
6-746-27-65
Atmane T.[1]
Braswell M.
7-647-65
Krueger M.
Gea A.
6-46-4
Fonseca J.
Shimizu Y.
6-36-4
Grenier H.[3]
Tomic B.
6-26-4
Jubb P.
Wu T.
6-42-66-1
Holt B.
Fenty A.
6-17-64
Fearnley J.
Tu L.
6-46-3
Polmans M.
Galarneau A.[5]
2-67-656-4
Diallo G.
Trotter J.
6-46-2
Sekulic P.
Wong C.[7]
6-26-1
Yunchaokete B.[6]
Zheng M.
6-46-4
Basavareddy N.
Lajal M.
2-67-667-5
Hong S.[8]
Bolt A.
6-46-3
Mayo A.
Ficovich J.
6-43-67-5
Tien L.
Bonzi B.[2]
6-46-4