Learner Tien vs Benjamin Bonzi — Chicago CH Round of 32

Chicago CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Learner Tien
USA
Learner Tien
#15ATP
1941ELO
1904Hard ELO
$1.3MYTD
$4.4MCAREER
20 yrs · 180 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWWWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 22 July 2024
hard
Benjamin Bonzi
FRA2
Benjamin Bonzi
#102ATP
1749ELO
1713Hard ELO
$396kYTD
$4.6MCAREER
30 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWWWWL
Tien L.
6-4 6-4
Bonzi B.
Tien L.
662
Bonzi B.
440

Learner Tien defeated Benjamin Bonzi 6-4 6-4 in the Chicago CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Learner Tien came in ranked #15.

Key context

  • Match story: Learner Tien edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Tien L.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Bonzi B.

Bonzi B.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Tien L.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Tien L.Bonzi B.
32
Serve
27
67
Return
32

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Tien L.Bonzi B.
1st serve in·Even
62%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
53%
Service points won·Even
63%
65%
Return points won·Even
39%
37%
Break points saved·Even
63%
61%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.5
5.5
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.7
2.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (142 vs 159). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Tien L.Bonzi B.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
90
65
Break points saved·Even
97
96
Break points won·Dominant
83
27
Deciding sets·Clear edge
100
77
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
100
90

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Tien L.
7.6
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Bonzi B.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.2+191 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.8Hard Elo 1713
6.9Overall Elo 1941
ELO gap
3.1Overall Elo 1749
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
8.5
Surface form
7.9
9.05-match win streak
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
2.1
3-set count
4.0
8.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0
5.0
Opponent rise

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Tien L.Bonzi B.
Freshness·Even
95
96

Tien L.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Bonzi B.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Diallo G.
Yunchaokete B.[6]
6-37-63
Semi-finals
Diallo G.
Fearnley J.
6-26-3
Yunchaokete B.[6]
Tien L.
6-47-5
Quarter-finals
Fearnley J.
Holt B.
6-36-2
Diallo G.
Krueger M.
6-36-2
Yunchaokete B.[6]
Grenier H.[3]
6-26-796-1
Tien L.
Hong S.[8]
6-36-1
R16
Hong S.[8]
Broom C.
6-36-746-4
Fearnley J.
Atmane T.[1]
6-21-67-63
Holt B.
Polmans M.
6-47-64
Diallo G.
Fonseca J.
7-616-1
Krueger M.
Sekulic P.
6-46-2
Yunchaokete B.[6]
Jubb P.
6-36-3
Grenier H.[3]
Basavareddy N.
6-46-0
Tien L.
Mayo A.
6-36-746-3
R32
Broom C.
Shimabukuro S.
6-746-27-65
Atmane T.[1]
Braswell M.
7-647-65
Krueger M.
Gea A.
6-46-4
Fonseca J.
Shimizu Y.
6-36-4
Grenier H.[3]
Tomic B.
6-26-4
Jubb P.
Wu T.
6-42-66-1
Holt B.
Fenty A.
6-17-64
Fearnley J.
Tu L.
6-46-3
Polmans M.
Galarneau A.[5]
2-67-656-4
Diallo G.
Trotter J.
6-46-2
Sekulic P.
Wong C.[7]
6-26-1
Yunchaokete B.[6]
Zheng M.
6-46-4
Basavareddy N.
Lajal M.
2-67-667-5
Hong S.[8]
Bolt A.
6-46-3
Mayo A.
Ficovich J.
6-43-67-5
Tien L.
Bonzi B.[2]
6-46-4