Paul Jubb vs Tung Lin Wu — Chicago CH Round of 32

Chicago CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
GBR
Paul Jubb
#338ATP
1426ELO
1403Hard ELO
26 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWLWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 22 July 2024
hard
Tung Lin Wu
TPE
Tung Lin Wu
#329ATP
1406ELO
1376Hard ELO
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLLW
Jubb P.
6-4 2-6 6-1
Wu T.
Jubb P.
6262
Wu T.
4611

Paul Jubb defeated Tung Lin Wu 6-4 2-6 6-1 in the Chicago CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Paul Jubb came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–4 2–6 6–1.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Jubb P.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Wu T.

Wu T.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Jubb P.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Jubb P.Wu T.
1st serve in·Slight edge
61%
68%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
52%
Service points won·Even
62%
63%
Return points won·Even
40%
39%
Break points saved·Even
61%
63%
Aces / match·Even
4.0
3.8
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.9
1.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (102 vs 131). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Jubb P.Wu T.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
37
10
Break points saved·Even
84
84
Break points won·Even
6
6
Deciding sets·Dominant
44
6
Tiebreaks·Dominant
73
4

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Jubb P.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Wu T.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.0+27 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
5.0Hard Elo 1376
4.9Overall Elo 1426
ELO gap
5.1Overall Elo 1406
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
7.2
Surface form
5.3
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
6.6
3-set count
7.0
0.0
Prev. match
6.0
7.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Jubb P.Wu T.
Freshness·Clear edge
100
88

Jubb P.: 19 days rest · Wu T.: 8 days rest · 3 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Diallo G.
Yunchaokete B.[6]
6-37-63
Semi-finals
Diallo G.
Fearnley J.
6-26-3
Yunchaokete B.[6]
Tien L.
6-47-5
Quarter-finals
Fearnley J.
Holt B.
6-36-2
Diallo G.
Krueger M.
6-36-2
Yunchaokete B.[6]
Grenier H.[3]
6-26-796-1
Tien L.
Hong S.[8]
6-36-1
R16
Hong S.[8]
Broom C.
6-36-746-4
Fearnley J.
Atmane T.[1]
6-21-67-63
Holt B.
Polmans M.
6-47-64
Diallo G.
Fonseca J.
7-616-1
Krueger M.
Sekulic P.
6-46-2
Yunchaokete B.[6]
Jubb P.
6-36-3
Grenier H.[3]
Basavareddy N.
6-46-0
Tien L.
Mayo A.
6-36-746-3
R32
Broom C.
Shimabukuro S.
6-746-27-65
Atmane T.[1]
Braswell M.
7-647-65
Krueger M.
Gea A.
6-46-4
Fonseca J.
Shimizu Y.
6-36-4
Grenier H.[3]
Tomic B.
6-26-4
Jubb P.
Wu T.
6-42-66-1
Holt B.
Fenty A.
6-17-64
Fearnley J.
Tu L.
6-46-3
Polmans M.
Galarneau A.[5]
2-67-656-4
Diallo G.
Trotter J.
6-46-2
Sekulic P.
Wong C.[7]
6-26-1
Yunchaokete B.[6]
Zheng M.
6-46-4
Basavareddy N.
Lajal M.
2-67-667-5
Hong S.[8]
Bolt A.
6-46-3
Mayo A.
Ficovich J.
6-43-67-5
Tien L.
Bonzi B.[2]
6-46-4