Mitchell Krueger vs Philip Sekulic — Chicago CH Round of 16

Chicago CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Mitchell Krueger
USA
Mitchell Krueger
#349ATP
1461ELO
1436Hard ELO
32 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 22 July 2024
hard
AUS
Philip Sekulic
#322ATP
1390ELO
1363Hard ELO
22 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWWLWW
Krueger M.
6-4 6-2
Sekulic P.
Krueger M.
662
Sekulic P.
420

Mitchell Krueger defeated Philip Sekulic 6-4 6-2 in the Chicago CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Krueger M.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Sekulic P.

Sekulic P.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Krueger M.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Krueger M.Sekulic P.
1st serve in·Even
64%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
49%
Service points won·Even
63%
62%
Return points won·Even
38%
38%
Break points saved·Even
60%
61%
Aces / match·Even
4.5
4.4
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.1
3.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (149 vs 104). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Krueger M.Sekulic P.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
15
27
Break points saved·Slight edge
87
79
Break points won·Slight edge
14
9
Deciding sets·Dominant
12
45
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
0
19

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Krueger M.
7.0
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Sekulic P.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.9+72 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.1Hard Elo 1363
6.8Overall Elo 1461
ELO gap
3.2Overall Elo 1390
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.6
Surface form
5.6
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
8.2
Minutes 14d
5.4
3-set count
4.0
9.0
Prev. match
7.0
7.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Krueger M.Sekulic P.
Freshness·Slight edge
99
91

Krueger M.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Sekulic P.: 7 days rest · 1 match, 18 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Diallo G.
Yunchaokete B.[6]
6-37-63
Semi-finals
Diallo G.
Fearnley J.
6-26-3
Yunchaokete B.[6]
Tien L.
6-47-5
Quarter-finals
Fearnley J.
Holt B.
6-36-2
Diallo G.
Krueger M.
6-36-2
Yunchaokete B.[6]
Grenier H.[3]
6-26-796-1
Tien L.
Hong S.[8]
6-36-1
R16
Hong S.[8]
Broom C.
6-36-746-4
Fearnley J.
Atmane T.[1]
6-21-67-63
Holt B.
Polmans M.
6-47-64
Diallo G.
Fonseca J.
7-616-1
Krueger M.
Sekulic P.
6-46-2
Yunchaokete B.[6]
Jubb P.
6-36-3
Grenier H.[3]
Basavareddy N.
6-46-0
Tien L.
Mayo A.
6-36-746-3
R32
Broom C.
Shimabukuro S.
6-746-27-65
Atmane T.[1]
Braswell M.
7-647-65
Krueger M.
Gea A.
6-46-4
Fonseca J.
Shimizu Y.
6-36-4
Grenier H.[3]
Tomic B.
6-26-4
Jubb P.
Wu T.
6-42-66-1
Holt B.
Fenty A.
6-17-64
Fearnley J.
Tu L.
6-46-3
Polmans M.
Galarneau A.[5]
2-67-656-4
Diallo G.
Trotter J.
6-46-2
Sekulic P.
Wong C.[7]
6-26-1
Yunchaokete B.[6]
Zheng M.
6-46-4
Basavareddy N.
Lajal M.
2-67-667-5
Hong S.[8]
Bolt A.
6-46-3
Mayo A.
Ficovich J.
6-43-67-5
Tien L.
Bonzi B.[2]
6-46-4