Bu Yunchaokete vs Learner Tien — Chicago CH Semi-final

Chicago CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
CHN6
Bu Yunchaokete
1709ELO
1644Hard ELO
24 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWWWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 22 July 2024
hard
Learner Tien
USA
Learner Tien
#15ATP
1941ELO
1904Hard ELO
$1.3MYTD
$4.4MCAREER
20 yrs · 180 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWWWWW
Yunchaokete B.
6-4 7-5
Tien L.
Yunchaokete B.
672
Tien L.
450

Bu Yunchaokete defeated Learner Tien 6-4 7-5 in the Chicago CH semi-final on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Yunchaokete B.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Tien L.

Tien L.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Yunchaokete B.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Yunchaokete B.Tien L.
24
Serve
32
25
Return
67

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Yunchaokete B.Tien L.
1st serve in·Even
58%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
53%
Service points won·Even
65%
63%
Return points won·Even
37%
39%
Break points saved·Even
65%
62%
Aces / match·Clear edge
6.4
4.5
Double faults / match·Dominant
1.7
3.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (147 vs 142). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Yunchaokete B.Tien L.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
35
90
Break points saved·Even
97
97
Break points won·Dominant
26
83
Deciding sets·Dominant
38
100
Tiebreaks·Dominant
16
100

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Yunchaokete B.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Tien L.
8.4
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
1.3Hard Elo 1644
Surface ELO
8.7+260 Hard Elo edge
1.6Overall Elo 1709
ELO gap
8.4Overall Elo 1941
0.0No prior meetings
H2H
10.0
8.5
Surface form
8.5
9.07-match win streak
Win streak
9.05-match win streak
Fatigue & Travel
0.0
Minutes 14d
0.0
3-set count
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0
Opponent rise
2.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Yunchaokete B.Tien L.
Freshness·Slight edge
89
95

Yunchaokete B.: 5 days rest · 2 matches, 35 games (7d) · Tien L.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Diallo G.
Yunchaokete B.[6]
6-37-63
Semi-finals
Diallo G.
Fearnley J.
6-26-3
Yunchaokete B.[6]
Tien L.
6-47-5
Quarter-finals
Fearnley J.
Holt B.
6-36-2
Diallo G.
Krueger M.
6-36-2
Yunchaokete B.[6]
Grenier H.[3]
6-26-796-1
Tien L.
Hong S.[8]
6-36-1
R16
Hong S.[8]
Broom C.
6-36-746-4
Fearnley J.
Atmane T.[1]
6-21-67-63
Holt B.
Polmans M.
6-47-64
Diallo G.
Fonseca J.
7-616-1
Krueger M.
Sekulic P.
6-46-2
Yunchaokete B.[6]
Jubb P.
6-36-3
Grenier H.[3]
Basavareddy N.
6-46-0
Tien L.
Mayo A.
6-36-746-3
R32
Broom C.
Shimabukuro S.
6-746-27-65
Atmane T.[1]
Braswell M.
7-647-65
Krueger M.
Gea A.
6-46-4
Fonseca J.
Shimizu Y.
6-36-4
Grenier H.[3]
Tomic B.
6-26-4
Jubb P.
Wu T.
6-42-66-1
Holt B.
Fenty A.
6-17-64
Fearnley J.
Tu L.
6-46-3
Polmans M.
Galarneau A.[5]
2-67-656-4
Diallo G.
Trotter J.
6-46-2
Sekulic P.
Wong C.[7]
6-26-1
Yunchaokete B.[6]
Zheng M.
6-46-4
Basavareddy N.
Lajal M.
2-67-667-5
Hong S.[8]
Bolt A.
6-46-3
Mayo A.
Ficovich J.
6-43-67-5
Tien L.
Bonzi B.[2]
6-46-4