Charles Broom vs Sho Shimabukuro — Chicago CH Round of 32

Chicago CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
GBR
Charles Broom
#283ATP
1409ELO
1396Hard ELO
28 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLWWLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 22 July 2024
hard
Sho Shimabukuro
JPN
Sho Shimabukuro
#95ATP
1672ELO
1606Hard ELO
$268kYTD
$1.0MCAREER
28 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWWWWLW
Broom C.
6-7 6-2 7-6
Shimabukuro S.
Broom C.
646772
Shimabukuro S.
772651

Charles Broom defeated Sho Shimabukuro 6-7 6-2 7-6 in the Chicago CH round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Sho Shimabukuro came in ranked #95.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Broom C.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Shimabukuro S.

Shimabukuro S.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Broom C.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Broom C.Shimabukuro S.
1st serve in·Slight edge
63%
57%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
52%
Service points won·Even
63%
63%
Return points won·Even
38%
38%
Break points saved·Even
59%
63%
Aces / match·Even
6.3
5.7
Double faults / match·Even
2.6
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (84 vs 150). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Broom C.Shimabukuro S.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
10
42
Break points saved·Dominant
56
88
Break points won·Dominant
0
31
Deciding sets·Clear edge
36
50
Tiebreaks·Dominant
10
38

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Broom C.
5.1
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Shimabukuro S.
7.5
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
3.0Hard Elo 1396
Surface ELO
7.0+210 Hard Elo edge
2.9Overall Elo 1409
ELO gap
7.1Overall Elo 1672
0.0No prior meetings
H2H
10.0
4.4
Surface form
7.3
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
9.2
Minutes 14d
0.5
3-set count
0.0
9.0
Prev. match
7.0
7.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Broom C.Shimabukuro S.
Freshness·Clear edge
77
96

Broom C.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 30 games (7d) · Shimabukuro S.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Diallo G.
Yunchaokete B.[6]
6-37-63
Semi-finals
Diallo G.
Fearnley J.
6-26-3
Yunchaokete B.[6]
Tien L.
6-47-5
Quarter-finals
Fearnley J.
Holt B.
6-36-2
Diallo G.
Krueger M.
6-36-2
Yunchaokete B.[6]
Grenier H.[3]
6-26-796-1
Tien L.
Hong S.[8]
6-36-1
R16
Hong S.[8]
Broom C.
6-36-746-4
Fearnley J.
Atmane T.[1]
6-21-67-63
Holt B.
Polmans M.
6-47-64
Diallo G.
Fonseca J.
7-616-1
Krueger M.
Sekulic P.
6-46-2
Yunchaokete B.[6]
Jubb P.
6-36-3
Grenier H.[3]
Basavareddy N.
6-46-0
Tien L.
Mayo A.
6-36-746-3
R32
Broom C.
Shimabukuro S.
6-746-27-65
Atmane T.[1]
Braswell M.
7-647-65
Krueger M.
Gea A.
6-46-4
Fonseca J.
Shimizu Y.
6-36-4
Grenier H.[3]
Tomic B.
6-26-4
Jubb P.
Wu T.
6-42-66-1
Holt B.
Fenty A.
6-17-64
Fearnley J.
Tu L.
6-46-3
Polmans M.
Galarneau A.[5]
2-67-656-4
Diallo G.
Trotter J.
6-46-2
Sekulic P.
Wong C.[7]
6-26-1
Yunchaokete B.[6]
Zheng M.
6-46-4
Basavareddy N.
Lajal M.
2-67-667-5
Hong S.[8]
Bolt A.
6-46-3
Mayo A.
Ficovich J.
6-43-67-5
Tien L.
Bonzi B.[2]
6-46-4