Jacob Fearnley vs Brandon Holt — Chicago CH Quarter-final

Chicago CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
GBR
Jacob Fearnley
#123ATP
1600ELO
1565Hard ELO
$342kYTD
$1.8MCAREER
24 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWWLWLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 22 July 2024
hard
USA
Brandon Holt
#657ATP
1537ELO
1507Hard ELO
28 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLLWW
Fearnley J.
6-3 6-2
Holt B.
Fearnley J.
662
Holt B.
320

Jacob Fearnley defeated Brandon Holt 6-3 6-2 in the Chicago CH quarter-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Jacob Fearnley came in ranked #123.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Fearnley J.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Holt B.

Holt B.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Fearnley J.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Fearnley J.Holt B.
3
Serve
—
28
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Fearnley J.Holt B.
1st serve in·Slight edge
61%
67%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
51%
Service points won·Even
63%
63%
Return points won·Even
39%
39%
Break points saved·Even
61%
61%
Aces / match·Even
5.3
4.9
Double faults / match·Dominant
5.1
0.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (120 vs 143). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Fearnley J.Holt B.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
86
58
Break points saved·Slight edge
96
85
Break points won·Dominant
70
31
Deciding sets·Clear edge
99
79
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
86
69

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Fearnley J.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Holt B.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.9+58 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.1Hard Elo 1507
6.1Overall Elo 1600
ELO gap
3.9Overall Elo 1537
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
Surface form
5.4
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
8.2
Minutes 14d
5.6
7.0
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
8.0
7.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Fearnley J.Holt B.
Freshness·
36
—

Fearnley J.: 1 day rest · 5 matches, 139 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Diallo G.
Yunchaokete B.[6]
6-37-63
Semi-finals
Diallo G.
Fearnley J.
6-26-3
Yunchaokete B.[6]
Tien L.
6-47-5
Quarter-finals
Fearnley J.
Holt B.
6-36-2
Diallo G.
Krueger M.
6-36-2
Yunchaokete B.[6]
Grenier H.[3]
6-26-796-1
Tien L.
Hong S.[8]
6-36-1
R16
Hong S.[8]
Broom C.
6-36-746-4
Fearnley J.
Atmane T.[1]
6-21-67-63
Holt B.
Polmans M.
6-47-64
Diallo G.
Fonseca J.
7-616-1
Krueger M.
Sekulic P.
6-46-2
Yunchaokete B.[6]
Jubb P.
6-36-3
Grenier H.[3]
Basavareddy N.
6-46-0
Tien L.
Mayo A.
6-36-746-3
R32
Broom C.
Shimabukuro S.
6-746-27-65
Atmane T.[1]
Braswell M.
7-647-65
Krueger M.
Gea A.
6-46-4
Fonseca J.
Shimizu Y.
6-36-4
Grenier H.[3]
Tomic B.
6-26-4
Jubb P.
Wu T.
6-42-66-1
Holt B.
Fenty A.
6-17-64
Fearnley J.
Tu L.
6-46-3
Polmans M.
Galarneau A.[5]
2-67-656-4
Diallo G.
Trotter J.
6-46-2
Sekulic P.
Wong C.[7]
6-26-1
Yunchaokete B.[6]
Zheng M.
6-46-4
Basavareddy N.
Lajal M.
2-67-667-5
Hong S.[8]
Bolt A.
6-46-3
Mayo A.
Ficovich J.
6-43-67-5
Tien L.
Bonzi B.[2]
6-46-4