Hugo Grenier vs Bernard Tomic — Chicago CH Round of 32

Chicago CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Hugo Grenier
FRA3
Hugo Grenier
#221ATP
1548ELO
1523Hard ELO
30 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLLLLLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 22 July 2024
hard
Bernard Tomic
AUS
Bernard Tomic
#206ATP
1475ELO
1441Hard ELO
$117kYTD
$6.8MCAREER
33 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLWLLL
Grenier H.
6-2 6-4
Tomic B.
Grenier H.
662
Tomic B.
240

Hugo Grenier defeated Bernard Tomic 6-2 6-4 in the Chicago CH round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Bernard Tomic came in ranked #206, defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Grenier H.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Tomic B.

Tomic B.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Grenier H.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Grenier H.Tomic B.
1st serve in·Even
64%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
46%
50%
Service points won·Even
63%
63%
Return points won·Even
37%
37%
Break points saved·Even
60%
63%
Aces / match·Clear edge
7.8
5.6
Double faults / match·Dominant
4.2
1.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (162 vs 153). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Grenier H.Tomic B.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
37
53
Break points saved·Slight edge
86
92
Break points won·Even
8
4
Deciding sets·Slight edge
65
74
Tiebreaks·Dominant
23
79

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Grenier H.
6.8
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Tomic B.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.8+82 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.2Hard Elo 1441
5.8Overall Elo 1548
ELO gap
4.2Overall Elo 1475
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.5
Surface form
5.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
1.5
Minutes 14d
9.2
7.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
9.0
Surface transition
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Grenier H.Tomic B.
Freshness·Clear edge
100
81

Grenier H.: 21 days rest · Tomic B.: 4 days rest · 2 matches, 45 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Diallo G.
Yunchaokete B.[6]
6-37-63
Semi-finals
Diallo G.
Fearnley J.
6-26-3
Yunchaokete B.[6]
Tien L.
6-47-5
Quarter-finals
Fearnley J.
Holt B.
6-36-2
Diallo G.
Krueger M.
6-36-2
Yunchaokete B.[6]
Grenier H.[3]
6-26-796-1
Tien L.
Hong S.[8]
6-36-1
R16
Hong S.[8]
Broom C.
6-36-746-4
Fearnley J.
Atmane T.[1]
6-21-67-63
Holt B.
Polmans M.
6-47-64
Diallo G.
Fonseca J.
7-616-1
Krueger M.
Sekulic P.
6-46-2
Yunchaokete B.[6]
Jubb P.
6-36-3
Grenier H.[3]
Basavareddy N.
6-46-0
Tien L.
Mayo A.
6-36-746-3
R32
Broom C.
Shimabukuro S.
6-746-27-65
Atmane T.[1]
Braswell M.
7-647-65
Krueger M.
Gea A.
6-46-4
Fonseca J.
Shimizu Y.
6-36-4
Grenier H.[3]
Tomic B.
6-26-4
Jubb P.
Wu T.
6-42-66-1
Holt B.
Fenty A.
6-17-64
Fearnley J.
Tu L.
6-46-3
Polmans M.
Galarneau A.[5]
2-67-656-4
Diallo G.
Trotter J.
6-46-2
Sekulic P.
Wong C.[7]
6-26-1
Yunchaokete B.[6]
Zheng M.
6-46-4
Basavareddy N.
Lajal M.
2-67-667-5
Hong S.[8]
Bolt A.
6-46-3
Mayo A.
Ficovich J.
6-43-67-5
Tien L.
Bonzi B.[2]
6-46-4