Aidan Mayo vs Juan Pablo Ficovich — Chicago CH Round of 32

Chicago CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
USA
Aidan Mayo
#674ATP
1380ELO
1359Hard ELO
23 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 22 July 2024
hard
Juan Pablo Ficovich
ARG
Juan Pablo Ficovich
#224ATP
1415ELO
1419Hard ELO
$100kYTD
$984kCAREER
29 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWLLLL
Mayo A.
6-4 3-6 7-5
Ficovich J.
Mayo A.
6372
Ficovich J.
4651

Aidan Mayo defeated Juan Pablo Ficovich 6-4 3-6 7-5 in the Chicago CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Aidan Mayo closed it out in three sets, 6–4 3–6 7–5.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Mayo A.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Ficovich J.

Ficovich J.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Mayo A.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Mayo A.Ficovich J.
1st serve in·Slight edge
55%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
51%
Service points won·Even
62%
62%
Return points won·Even
38%
39%
Break points saved·Even
61%
57%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.9
4.1
Double faults / match·Dominant
4.1
2.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (102 vs 155). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Mayo A.Ficovich J.
Clutch Rating·Even
12
16
Break points saved·Slight edge
68
76
Break points won·Slight edge
1
9
Deciding sets·Clear edge
8
27
Tiebreaks·Dominant
52
5

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Mayo A.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Ficovich J.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
3.9Hard Elo 1359
Surface ELO
6.1+60 Hard Elo edge
4.0Overall Elo 1380
ELO gap
6.0Overall Elo 1415
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.9
Surface form
3.7
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
4.8
Minutes 14d
4.7
7.0
3-set count
7.0
7.0
Prev. match
9.0
7.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Mayo A.Ficovich J.
Freshness·Slight edge
89
83

Mayo A.: 8 days rest · 2 matches (14d) · Ficovich J.: 5 days rest · 1 match, 33 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Diallo G.
Yunchaokete B.[6]
6-37-63
Semi-finals
Diallo G.
Fearnley J.
6-26-3
Yunchaokete B.[6]
Tien L.
6-47-5
Quarter-finals
Fearnley J.
Holt B.
6-36-2
Diallo G.
Krueger M.
6-36-2
Yunchaokete B.[6]
Grenier H.[3]
6-26-796-1
Tien L.
Hong S.[8]
6-36-1
R16
Hong S.[8]
Broom C.
6-36-746-4
Fearnley J.
Atmane T.[1]
6-21-67-63
Holt B.
Polmans M.
6-47-64
Diallo G.
Fonseca J.
7-616-1
Krueger M.
Sekulic P.
6-46-2
Yunchaokete B.[6]
Jubb P.
6-36-3
Grenier H.[3]
Basavareddy N.
6-46-0
Tien L.
Mayo A.
6-36-746-3
R32
Broom C.
Shimabukuro S.
6-746-27-65
Atmane T.[1]
Braswell M.
7-647-65
Krueger M.
Gea A.
6-46-4
Fonseca J.
Shimizu Y.
6-36-4
Grenier H.[3]
Tomic B.
6-26-4
Jubb P.
Wu T.
6-42-66-1
Holt B.
Fenty A.
6-17-64
Fearnley J.
Tu L.
6-46-3
Polmans M.
Galarneau A.[5]
2-67-656-4
Diallo G.
Trotter J.
6-46-2
Sekulic P.
Wong C.[7]
6-26-1
Yunchaokete B.[6]
Zheng M.
6-46-4
Basavareddy N.
Lajal M.
2-67-667-5
Hong S.[8]
Bolt A.
6-46-3
Mayo A.
Ficovich J.
6-43-67-5
Tien L.
Bonzi B.[2]
6-46-4