Learner Tien vs Seong Chan Hong — Chicago CH Quarter-final

Chicago CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Learner Tien
USA
Learner Tien
#15ATP
1941ELO
1904Hard ELO
$1.3MYTD
$4.4MCAREER
20 yrs · 180 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWWWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 22 July 2024
hard
KOR8
Seong Chan Hong
29 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLWLWL
Tien L.
6-3 6-1
Hong S.
Tien L.
662
Hong S.
310

Learner Tien defeated Seong Chan Hong 6-3 6-1 in the Chicago CH quarter-final on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Tien L.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Hong S.

Hong S.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Tien L.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Tien L.Hong S.
32
Serve
—
67
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Tien L.Hong S.
1st serve in·Even
62%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
52%
Service points won·Even
63%
61%
Return points won·Even
39%
39%
Break points saved·Even
63%
60%
Aces / match·Even
4.5
4.0
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.7
2.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (142 vs 68). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Tien L.Hong S.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
90
52
Break points saved·Clear edge
97
77
Break points won·Dominant
83
30
Deciding sets·Dominant
100
65
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
100
80

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Tien L.
7.1
Strong advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Hong S.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
8.5
Surface form
5.4
9.05-match win streak
Win streak
0.0Lost last 4
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
8.5
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
Surface transition
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Tien L.Hong S.
Freshness·
95
—

Tien L.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Diallo G.
Yunchaokete B.[6]
6-37-63
Semi-finals
Diallo G.
Fearnley J.
6-26-3
Yunchaokete B.[6]
Tien L.
6-47-5
Quarter-finals
Fearnley J.
Holt B.
6-36-2
Diallo G.
Krueger M.
6-36-2
Yunchaokete B.[6]
Grenier H.[3]
6-26-796-1
Tien L.
Hong S.[8]
6-36-1
R16
Hong S.[8]
Broom C.
6-36-746-4
Fearnley J.
Atmane T.[1]
6-21-67-63
Holt B.
Polmans M.
6-47-64
Diallo G.
Fonseca J.
7-616-1
Krueger M.
Sekulic P.
6-46-2
Yunchaokete B.[6]
Jubb P.
6-36-3
Grenier H.[3]
Basavareddy N.
6-46-0
Tien L.
Mayo A.
6-36-746-3
R32
Broom C.
Shimabukuro S.
6-746-27-65
Atmane T.[1]
Braswell M.
7-647-65
Krueger M.
Gea A.
6-46-4
Fonseca J.
Shimizu Y.
6-36-4
Grenier H.[3]
Tomic B.
6-26-4
Jubb P.
Wu T.
6-42-66-1
Holt B.
Fenty A.
6-17-64
Fearnley J.
Tu L.
6-46-3
Polmans M.
Galarneau A.[5]
2-67-656-4
Diallo G.
Trotter J.
6-46-2
Sekulic P.
Wong C.[7]
6-26-1
Yunchaokete B.[6]
Zheng M.
6-46-4
Basavareddy N.
Lajal M.
2-67-667-5
Hong S.[8]
Bolt A.
6-46-3
Mayo A.
Ficovich J.
6-43-67-5
Tien L.
Bonzi B.[2]
6-46-4