Jacob Fearnley vs Li Tu — Chicago CH Round of 32

Chicago CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
GBR
Jacob Fearnley
#123ATP
1600ELO
1565Hard ELO
$342kYTD
$1.8MCAREER
24 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWWLWLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 22 July 2024
hard
AUS
Li Tu
#464ATP
1488ELO
1471Hard ELO
30 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWWW
Fearnley J.
6-4 6-3
Tu L.
Fearnley J.
662
Tu L.
430

Jacob Fearnley defeated Li Tu 6-4 6-3 in the Chicago CH round of 32 on hard. Jacob Fearnley claimed a first win over Li Tu in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2024-07-15NewportQ2grassLi Tu6-4 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Fearnley J.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Tu L.

Tu L.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Fearnley J.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Fearnley J.Tu L.
3
Serve
—
28
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Fearnley J.Tu L.
1st serve in·Even
61%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
51%
Service points won·Even
63%
65%
Return points won·Even
39%
37%
Break points saved·Even
61%
61%
Aces / match·Slight edge
5.4
6.7
Double faults / match·Dominant
5.1
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (120 vs 124). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Fearnley J.Tu L.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
86
27
Break points saved·Clear edge
96
82
Break points won·Dominant
70
8
Deciding sets·Dominant
99
20
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
86
64

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Fearnley J.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Tu L.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.1+94 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.9Hard Elo 1471
6.2Overall Elo 1600
ELO gap
3.8Overall Elo 1488
5.0
H2H
5.0
Surface form
2.8
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
8.2
Minutes 14d
7.7
7.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
7.0
Surface transition
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Fearnley J.Tu L.
Freshness·
36
—

Fearnley J.: 1 day rest · 5 matches, 139 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Diallo G.
Yunchaokete B.[6]
6-37-63
Semi-finals
Diallo G.
Fearnley J.
6-26-3
Yunchaokete B.[6]
Tien L.
6-47-5
Quarter-finals
Fearnley J.
Holt B.
6-36-2
Diallo G.
Krueger M.
6-36-2
Yunchaokete B.[6]
Grenier H.[3]
6-26-796-1
Tien L.
Hong S.[8]
6-36-1
R16
Hong S.[8]
Broom C.
6-36-746-4
Fearnley J.
Atmane T.[1]
6-21-67-63
Holt B.
Polmans M.
6-47-64
Diallo G.
Fonseca J.
7-616-1
Krueger M.
Sekulic P.
6-46-2
Yunchaokete B.[6]
Jubb P.
6-36-3
Grenier H.[3]
Basavareddy N.
6-46-0
Tien L.
Mayo A.
6-36-746-3
R32
Broom C.
Shimabukuro S.
6-746-27-65
Atmane T.[1]
Braswell M.
7-647-65
Krueger M.
Gea A.
6-46-4
Fonseca J.
Shimizu Y.
6-36-4
Grenier H.[3]
Tomic B.
6-26-4
Jubb P.
Wu T.
6-42-66-1
Holt B.
Fenty A.
6-17-64
Fearnley J.
Tu L.
6-46-3
Polmans M.
Galarneau A.[5]
2-67-656-4
Diallo G.
Trotter J.
6-46-2
Sekulic P.
Wong C.[7]
6-26-1
Yunchaokete B.[6]
Zheng M.
6-46-4
Basavareddy N.
Lajal M.
2-67-667-5
Hong S.[8]
Bolt A.
6-46-3
Mayo A.
Ficovich J.
6-43-67-5
Tien L.
Bonzi B.[2]
6-46-4