Learner Tien vs Aidan Mayo — Chicago CH Round of 16

Chicago CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Learner Tien
USA
Learner Tien
#15ATP
1941ELO
1904Hard ELO
$1.3MYTD
$4.4MCAREER
20 yrs · 180 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWWWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 22 July 2024
hard
USA
Aidan Mayo
#674ATP
1380ELO
1359Hard ELO
23 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWLWW
Tien L.
6-3 6-7 6-3
Mayo A.
Tien L.
66462
Mayo A.
37731

Learner Tien defeated Aidan Mayo 6-3 6-7 6-3 in the Chicago CH round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — Learner Tien came in ranked #15.

Key context

  • Match story: Learner Tien closed it out in three sets, 6–3 6–7 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Tien L.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Mayo A.

Mayo A.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Tien L.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Tien L.Mayo A.
32
Serve
—
67
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Tien L.Mayo A.
1st serve in·Slight edge
62%
55%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
51%
Service points won·Even
63%
62%
Return points won·Even
39%
38%
Break points saved·Even
62%
61%
Aces / match·Even
4.5
4.9
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.7
4.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (142 vs 102). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Tien L.Mayo A.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
90
12
Break points saved·Dominant
97
68
Break points won·Dominant
83
1
Deciding sets·Dominant
100
8
Tiebreaks·Dominant
100
52

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Tien L.
8.4
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Mayo A.
4.7
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
10.0+545 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
0.0Hard Elo 1359
10.0Overall Elo 1941
ELO gap
0.0Overall Elo 1380
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
8.5
Surface form
4.9
9.05-match win streak
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
4.8
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
7.0
Surface transition
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Tien L.Mayo A.
Freshness·Even
91
89

Tien L.: 12 days rest · 2 matches (14d) · Mayo A.: 8 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Diallo G.
Yunchaokete B.[6]
6-37-63
Semi-finals
Diallo G.
Fearnley J.
6-26-3
Yunchaokete B.[6]
Tien L.
6-47-5
Quarter-finals
Fearnley J.
Holt B.
6-36-2
Diallo G.
Krueger M.
6-36-2
Yunchaokete B.[6]
Grenier H.[3]
6-26-796-1
Tien L.
Hong S.[8]
6-36-1
R16
Hong S.[8]
Broom C.
6-36-746-4
Fearnley J.
Atmane T.[1]
6-21-67-63
Holt B.
Polmans M.
6-47-64
Diallo G.
Fonseca J.
7-616-1
Krueger M.
Sekulic P.
6-46-2
Yunchaokete B.[6]
Jubb P.
6-36-3
Grenier H.[3]
Basavareddy N.
6-46-0
Tien L.
Mayo A.
6-36-746-3
R32
Broom C.
Shimabukuro S.
6-746-27-65
Atmane T.[1]
Braswell M.
7-647-65
Krueger M.
Gea A.
6-46-4
Fonseca J.
Shimizu Y.
6-36-4
Grenier H.[3]
Tomic B.
6-26-4
Jubb P.
Wu T.
6-42-66-1
Holt B.
Fenty A.
6-17-64
Fearnley J.
Tu L.
6-46-3
Polmans M.
Galarneau A.[5]
2-67-656-4
Diallo G.
Trotter J.
6-46-2
Sekulic P.
Wong C.[7]
6-26-1
Yunchaokete B.[6]
Zheng M.
6-46-4
Basavareddy N.
Lajal M.
2-67-667-5
Hong S.[8]
Bolt A.
6-46-3
Mayo A.
Ficovich J.
6-43-67-5
Tien L.
Bonzi B.[2]
6-46-4