Timo Legout vs Braden Shick — Cary Final

Cary · CHALLENGER · Final
FRA
Timo Legout
#961ATP
24 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWLWWLWW
1 — 2
Sets
Monday, 6 July 2026 ·
hard
STADIUM · 1st on
USA
Braden Shick
#325ATP
1384ELO
1358Hard ELO
22 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWLWWWWW
Legout T.
6-4 5-7 3-6
Shick B.
Legout T.
6531
Shick B.
4762

Braden Shick recovered from a set down to defeat Timo Legout 4-6 7-5 6-3 in the Cary final.

Key context

  • Set 2, game 9: A 13-point game with four deuces went Braden Shick's way.
  • Set 3, game 4: Braden Shick broke serve.
  • Pressure points: Timo Legout converted 4 of 9 break points; Braden Shick converted 5 of 6 break points.

Pressure & serve by court

Legout T.
Shick B.
Break points won
4/9
5/6
Break points saved
1/6
5/9

Break points from this match. Serve-by-court shows the share of service points won from each side of the court; the court side alternates every point.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Legout T.serving64% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Shick B.

Shick B.serving66% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Legout T.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Legout T.Shick B.
1st serve in·Clear edge
65%
53%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
60%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
45%
48%
Service points won·Even
55%
59%
Return points won·Even
44%
41%
Break points saved·Slight edge
61%
55%
Aces / match·Clear edge
1.0
3.6
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.6
3.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (5 vs 16). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Legout T.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Back-to-back day (−0.5)
Shick B.
7.0
Strong advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0No prior meetings
8.38 of last 10 on hard
Surface form
9.09 of last 10 on hard
7.04-match win streak
Win streak
7.04-match win streak
Context
5.0Didn't play here last year
Defending pts
5.0Didn't play here last year
Opponent rise
5.0Opponent hot: 8 of last 10

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Legout T.Shick B.
Freshness·Clear edge
62
76

Legout T.: played today · 4 matches, 77 games (7d) · Shick B.: 2 days rest · 3 matches, 53 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Weather
34°COvercast
Wind 4 km/hHumidity 42%
R32
R16
Quarter-finals
Semi-finals
Final
Sakamoto R.[1]
Leroux J.
6-36-736-2
Legout T.
Bicknell B.
6-36-2
Ellis B.
Sekulic P.
7-56-747-5
Baris O.
Ficovich J.[6]
6-45-76-4
Glinka D.[3]
Mayo A.
7-612-67-65
Winter E.
Fenty A.
3-0
Hussey G.
W. Manning
1-62-6
Shimizu Y.
Mmoh M.[5]
6-736-75
Broady L.[7]
Matsuoka H.
6-16-2
Kennedy J.
Uchida K.
6-46-4
Watanuki Y.
Ilagan A.
3-66-06-3
Wu T.
Boulais J.
6-786-47-63
Noguchi R.[8]
A. Martinez
1-63-6
Wolf J.
Friend J.
7-56-753-6
Sun F.
Shick B.
1-62-6
Suresh D.
Draxl L.[2]
7-656-4
Sakamoto R.[1]
Legout T.
4-63-6
Ellis B.
Baris O.
1-64-6
Glinka D.[3]
Winter E.
7-664-64-6
W. Manning
Mmoh M.[5]
7-673-63-3
Broady L.[7]
Kennedy J.
6-25-76-75
Watanuki Y.
Wu T.
6-36-716-1
A. Martinez
Friend J.
1-62-6
Shick B.
Suresh D.
6-44-1
Legout T.
Baris O.
6-46-1
Winter E.
W. Manning
6-36-4
Kennedy J.
Watanuki Y.
1-64-6
Friend J.
Shick B.
6-764-6
Legout T.
Winter E.
7-57-5
Watanuki Y.
Shick B.
Legout T.
Shick B.
6-45-73-6