Jan Choinski vs Patrick Zahraj — Lugano CH Round of 32

Lugano CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Jan Choinski
GBR
Jan Choinski
#75ATP
1686ELO
1571Hard ELO
$204kYTD
$1.2MCAREER
30 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWWLWLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 24 February 2025
hard
GER
Patrick Zahraj
#425ATP
1331ELO
1322Hard ELO
26 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWLW
Choinski J.
6-2 6-7 6-3
Zahraj P.
Choinski J.
66362
Zahraj P.
27731

Jan Choinski defeated Patrick Zahraj 6-2 6-7 6-3 in the Lugano CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Jan Choinski came in ranked #75, defending last year's round of 16.

Key context

  • Match story: Jan Choinski closed it out in three sets, 6–2 6–7 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Choinski J.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Zahraj P.

Zahraj P.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Choinski J.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Choinski J.Zahraj P.
1st serve in·Slight edge
65%
58%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
70%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
52%
45%
Service points won·Even
63%
59%
Return points won·Even
37%
39%
Break points saved·Even
64%
61%
Aces / match·Even
4.5
5.1
Double faults / match·Dominant
1.6
4.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (97 vs 82). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Choinski J.Zahraj P.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
55
20
Break points saved·Clear edge
90
69
Break points won·Slight edge
20
10
Deciding sets·Dominant
88
7
Tiebreaks·Dominant
41
77

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Choinski J.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry Score
Zahraj P.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.8+249 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.2Hard Elo 1322
7.6Overall Elo 1686
ELO gap
2.4Overall Elo 1331
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
2.0
Surface form
7.1
0.0Lost last 4
Win streak
7.03-match win streak
Fatigue & Travel
9.3
Minutes 14d
2.2
3-set count
4.0
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0
5.0
Opponent rise

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Choinski J.Zahraj P.
Freshness·Dominant
55
80

Choinski J.: 2 days rest · 5 matches, 113 games (7d) · Zahraj P.: 3 days rest · 2 matches, 53 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Coric B.[2]
Collignon R.[1]
6-36-1
Semi-finals
Collignon R.[1]
Cassone M.
7-634-66-3
Coric B.[2]
Prizmic D.
6-26-4
Quarter-finals
Collignon R.[1]
Draxl L.[8]
6-46-4
Cassone M.
Van Assche L.[3]
7-620-67-64
Prizmic D.
Gaubas V.[7]
6-26-3
Coric B.[2]
Squire H.[6]
6-26-2
R16
Collignon R.[1]
Durasovic V.
6-47-5
Gaubas V.[7]
Rottgering M.
6-727-56-4
Coric B.[2]
Escoffier A.
6-46-4
Draxl L.[8]
Ruusuvuori E.
6-47-62
Van Assche L.[3]
Choinski J.
6-36-1
Cassone M.
Grenier H.[5]
7-677-66
Squire H.[6]
Bertola R.
7-656-4
Prizmic D.
Blockx A.[4]
6-36-2
R32
Rottgering M.
Zhukayev B.
4-67-6107-65
Prizmic D.
Paul J.
6-36-2
Gaubas V.[7]
Stricker D.
6-31-66-2
Durasovic V.
Hassan B.
6-41-66-4
Ruusuvuori E.
Chidekh C.
6-33-66-4
Draxl L.[8]
Sakamoto R.
6-46-4
Choinski J.
Zahraj P.
6-26-736-3
Cassone M.
Berankis R.
6-16-2
Blockx A.[4]
Prado Angelo J.
6-26-3
Squire H.[6]
Andreev A.
6-37-5
Escoffier A.
Brunold M.
6-26-3
Bertola R.
Butvilas E.
2-67-57-64
Coric B.[2]
Onclin G.
6-46-2
Collignon R.[1]
Sachko V.
6-47-5
Grenier H.[5]
Cui J.
6-26-4
Van Assche L.[3]
Wu T.
2-66-26-0