Antoine Escoffier vs Mika Brunold — Lugano CH Round of 32

Lugano CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
FRA
Antoine Escoffier
#753ATP
1436ELO
1413Hard ELO
34 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWLWLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 24 February 2025
hard
SUI
Mika Brunold
#414ATP
1466ELO
1443Hard ELO
21 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWWLWW
Escoffier A.
6-2 6-3
Brunold M.
Escoffier A.
662
Brunold M.
230

Antoine Escoffier defeated Mika Brunold 6-2 6-3 in the Lugano CH round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Mika Brunold came in ranked #414, defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Escoffier A.serving70% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Brunold M.

Brunold M.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Escoffier A.

Serve advantage — Brunold M.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Escoffier A.Brunold M.
1st serve in·Slight edge
56%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
52%
Service points won·Even
59%
62%
Return points won·Even
38%
40%
Break points saved·Even
60%
59%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.8
2.6
Double faults / match·Clear edge
4.6
3.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (36 vs 71). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Escoffier A.Brunold M.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
10
24
Break points saved·Even
68
72
Break points won·Even
18
15
Deciding sets·Slight edge
11
3
Tiebreaks·Dominant
3
92

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Escoffier A.
4.4
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Brunold M.
4.9
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
4.6Hard Elo 1413
Surface ELO
5.4+30 Hard Elo edge
4.5Overall Elo 1436
ELO gap
5.5Overall Elo 1466
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
3.3
Surface form
6.8
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
8.3
Minutes 14d
8.8
7.0
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
Context
6.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Coric B.[2]
Collignon R.[1]
6-36-1
Semi-finals
Collignon R.[1]
Cassone M.
7-634-66-3
Coric B.[2]
Prizmic D.
6-26-4
Quarter-finals
Collignon R.[1]
Draxl L.[8]
6-46-4
Cassone M.
Van Assche L.[3]
7-620-67-64
Prizmic D.
Gaubas V.[7]
6-26-3
Coric B.[2]
Squire H.[6]
6-26-2
R16
Collignon R.[1]
Durasovic V.
6-47-5
Gaubas V.[7]
Rottgering M.
6-727-56-4
Coric B.[2]
Escoffier A.
6-46-4
Draxl L.[8]
Ruusuvuori E.
6-47-62
Van Assche L.[3]
Choinski J.
6-36-1
Cassone M.
Grenier H.[5]
7-677-66
Squire H.[6]
Bertola R.
7-656-4
Prizmic D.
Blockx A.[4]
6-36-2
R32
Rottgering M.
Zhukayev B.
4-67-6107-65
Prizmic D.
Paul J.
6-36-2
Gaubas V.[7]
Stricker D.
6-31-66-2
Durasovic V.
Hassan B.
6-41-66-4
Ruusuvuori E.
Chidekh C.
6-33-66-4
Draxl L.[8]
Sakamoto R.
6-46-4
Choinski J.
Zahraj P.
6-26-736-3
Cassone M.
Berankis R.
6-16-2
Blockx A.[4]
Prado Angelo J.
6-26-3
Squire H.[6]
Andreev A.
6-37-5
Escoffier A.
Brunold M.
6-26-3
Bertola R.
Butvilas E.
2-67-57-64
Coric B.[2]
Onclin G.
6-46-2
Collignon R.[1]
Sachko V.
6-47-5
Grenier H.[5]
Cui J.
6-26-4
Van Assche L.[3]
Wu T.
2-66-26-0