Antoine Escoffier vs Mika Brunold — Lugano CH Quarter-final

Lugano CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
FRA
Antoine Escoffier
#753ATP
1436ELO
1413Hard ELO
34 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWLWLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 6 March 2023
hard
SUI
Mika Brunold
#414ATP
1466ELO
1443Hard ELO
21 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWWLWW
Escoffier A.
6-0 6-3
Brunold M.
Escoffier A.
662
Brunold M.
030

Antoine Escoffier defeated Mika Brunold 6-0 6-3 in the Lugano CH quarter-final on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Escoffier A.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Brunold M.

Brunold M.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Escoffier A.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Escoffier A.Brunold M.
1st serve in·Even
58%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
51%
Service points won·Even
62%
61%
Return points won·Even
39%
40%
Break points saved·Even
61%
59%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.1
2.8
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.7
3.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (163 vs 103). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Escoffier A.Brunold M.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
10
24
Break points saved·Even
68
72
Break points won·Even
18
15
Deciding sets·Slight edge
12
3
Tiebreaks·Dominant
3
92

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Escoffier A.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Brunold M.
4.3
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 343 days (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
4.6Hard Elo 1413
Surface ELO
5.4+30 Hard Elo edge
4.5Overall Elo 1436
ELO gap
5.5Overall Elo 1466
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.3
Surface form
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
6.3
Minutes 14d
4.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Virtanen O.
Ilkel C.
6-47-65
Semi-finals
Ilkel C.
Escoffier A.
7-654-66-3
Virtanen O.
Stricker D.[2]
6-736-36-0
Quarter-finals
Stricker D.[2]
Broady L.[5]
3-66-37-64
Virtanen O.
Berankis R.
6-46-3
Ilkel C.
Sachko V.
6-27-5
Escoffier A.
Brunold M.
6-06-3
R16
Virtanen O.
Krutykh O.
6-42-67-65
Stricker D.[2]
Onclin G.
6-36-3
Berankis R.
Grenier H.
6-41-67-5
Escoffier A.
Andreev A.
7-666-3
Ilkel C.
Ritschard A.
2-66-16-4
Sachko V.
Celikbilek A.
6-46-3
Broady L.[5]
Herbert P.
6-16-3
Brunold M.
Brancaccio R.[4]
7-56-3
R32
Herbert P.
Copil M.
7-6110-0
Brancaccio R.[4]
Gojowczyk P.
6-11-0
Krutykh O.
Sels J.[8]
6-47-5
Ritschard A.
Piros Z.
3-66-47-5
Virtanen O.
Gigante M.
6-746-36-2
Andreev A.
Bellier A.
6-747-646-3
Escoffier A.
Bergs Z.[6]
6-26-4
Broady L.[5]
Kukushkin M.
6-36-2
Brunold M.
Guinard M.
4-66-26-2
Berankis R.
Gombos N.[3]
6-37-62
Stricker D.[2]
Collignon R.
6-42-66-2
Onclin G.
Added D.
6-46-2
Grenier H.
Hemery C.
7-646-1
Ilkel C.
Klein L.[7]
6-44-67-5
Sachko V.
Paul J.
6-46-3
Celikbilek A.
Brouwer G.[1]
6-27-5