Liam Draxl vs Rei Sakamoto — Lugano CH Round of 32

Lugano CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Liam Draxl
CAN8
Liam Draxl
#223ATP
1592ELO
1565Hard ELO
$201kYTD
$642kCAREER
24 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 24 February 2025
hard
JPN
Rei Sakamoto
#161ATP
1608ELO
1589Hard ELO
$233kYTD
$492kCAREER
20 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLLWWW
Draxl L.
6-4 6-4
Sakamoto R.
Draxl L.
662
Sakamoto R.
440

Liam Draxl defeated Rei Sakamoto 6-4 6-4 in the Lugano CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Liam Draxl edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Draxl L.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Sakamoto R.

Sakamoto R.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Draxl L.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Draxl L.Sakamoto R.
1st serve in·Even
66%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
52%
Service points won·Even
62%
65%
Return points won·Even
40%
37%
Break points saved·Even
60%
61%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.2
6.9
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.3
2.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (108 vs 87). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Draxl L.Sakamoto R.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
66
49
Break points saved·Even
83
87
Break points won·Dominant
36
8
Deciding sets·Even
94
93
Tiebreaks·Dominant
75
23

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Draxl L.
4.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Sakamoto R.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
4.5Hard Elo 1565
Surface ELO
5.5+24 Hard Elo edge
4.5Overall Elo 1592
ELO gap
5.5Overall Elo 1608
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.7
Surface form
4.4
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
6.7
Minutes 14d
7.6
7.0
3-set count
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Draxl L.Sakamoto R.
Freshness·Even
98
95

Draxl L.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Sakamoto R.: 12 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Coric B.[2]
Collignon R.[1]
6-36-1
Semi-finals
Collignon R.[1]
Cassone M.
7-634-66-3
Coric B.[2]
Prizmic D.
6-26-4
Quarter-finals
Collignon R.[1]
Draxl L.[8]
6-46-4
Cassone M.
Van Assche L.[3]
7-620-67-64
Prizmic D.
Gaubas V.[7]
6-26-3
Coric B.[2]
Squire H.[6]
6-26-2
R16
Collignon R.[1]
Durasovic V.
6-47-5
Gaubas V.[7]
Rottgering M.
6-727-56-4
Coric B.[2]
Escoffier A.
6-46-4
Draxl L.[8]
Ruusuvuori E.
6-47-62
Van Assche L.[3]
Choinski J.
6-36-1
Cassone M.
Grenier H.[5]
7-677-66
Squire H.[6]
Bertola R.
7-656-4
Prizmic D.
Blockx A.[4]
6-36-2
R32
Rottgering M.
Zhukayev B.
4-67-6107-65
Prizmic D.
Paul J.
6-36-2
Gaubas V.[7]
Stricker D.
6-31-66-2
Durasovic V.
Hassan B.
6-41-66-4
Ruusuvuori E.
Chidekh C.
6-33-66-4
Draxl L.[8]
Sakamoto R.
6-46-4
Choinski J.
Zahraj P.
6-26-736-3
Cassone M.
Berankis R.
6-16-2
Blockx A.[4]
Prado Angelo J.
6-26-3
Squire H.[6]
Andreev A.
6-37-5
Escoffier A.
Brunold M.
6-26-3
Bertola R.
Butvilas E.
2-67-57-64
Coric B.[2]
Onclin G.
6-46-2
Collignon R.[1]
Sachko V.
6-47-5
Grenier H.[5]
Cui J.
6-26-4
Van Assche L.[3]
Wu T.
2-66-26-0