Dino Prizmic vs Jakub Paul — Lugano CH Round of 32

Lugano CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Dino Prizmic
CRO
Dino Prizmic
#84ATP
1841ELO
1733Hard ELO
$530kYTD
$1.3MCAREER
20 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWLLWLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 24 February 2025
hard
SUI
Jakub Paul
#543ATP
1389ELO
1340Hard ELO
27 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWLLWW
Prizmic D.
6-3 6-2
Paul J.
Prizmic D.
662
Paul J.
320

Dino Prizmic defeated Jakub Paul 6-3 6-2 in the Lugano CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Dino Prizmic came in ranked #84.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Prizmic D.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Paul J.

Paul J.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Prizmic D.

Serve advantage — Prizmic D.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Prizmic D.Paul J.
34
Serve
—
20
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Prizmic D.Paul J.
1st serve in·Slight edge
59%
65%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
73%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
54%
51%
Service points won·Slight edge
65%
60%
Return points won·Even
41%
41%
Break points saved·Even
64%
61%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.8
1.7
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.1
1.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (83 vs 65). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Prizmic D.Paul J.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
71
21
Break points saved·Dominant
92
62
Break points won·Dominant
64
20
Deciding sets·Dominant
92
5
Tiebreaks·Dominant
37
85

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Prizmic D.
7.6
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Paul J.
5.4
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
9.8+393 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
0.2Hard Elo 1340
10.0Overall Elo 1841
ELO gap
0.0Overall Elo 1389
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.9
Surface form
6.5
Fatigue & Travel
8.6
Minutes 14d
6.0
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Prizmic D.Paul J.
Freshness·
87
—

Prizmic D.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 16 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Coric B.[2]
Collignon R.[1]
6-36-1
Semi-finals
Collignon R.[1]
Cassone M.
7-634-66-3
Coric B.[2]
Prizmic D.
6-26-4
Quarter-finals
Collignon R.[1]
Draxl L.[8]
6-46-4
Cassone M.
Van Assche L.[3]
7-620-67-64
Prizmic D.
Gaubas V.[7]
6-26-3
Coric B.[2]
Squire H.[6]
6-26-2
R16
Collignon R.[1]
Durasovic V.
6-47-5
Gaubas V.[7]
Rottgering M.
6-727-56-4
Coric B.[2]
Escoffier A.
6-46-4
Draxl L.[8]
Ruusuvuori E.
6-47-62
Van Assche L.[3]
Choinski J.
6-36-1
Cassone M.
Grenier H.[5]
7-677-66
Squire H.[6]
Bertola R.
7-656-4
Prizmic D.
Blockx A.[4]
6-36-2
R32
Rottgering M.
Zhukayev B.
4-67-6107-65
Prizmic D.
Paul J.
6-36-2
Gaubas V.[7]
Stricker D.
6-31-66-2
Durasovic V.
Hassan B.
6-41-66-4
Ruusuvuori E.
Chidekh C.
6-33-66-4
Draxl L.[8]
Sakamoto R.
6-46-4
Choinski J.
Zahraj P.
6-26-736-3
Cassone M.
Berankis R.
6-16-2
Blockx A.[4]
Prado Angelo J.
6-26-3
Squire H.[6]
Andreev A.
6-37-5
Escoffier A.
Brunold M.
6-26-3
Bertola R.
Butvilas E.
2-67-57-64
Coric B.[2]
Onclin G.
6-46-2
Collignon R.[1]
Sachko V.
6-47-5
Grenier H.[5]
Cui J.
6-26-4
Van Assche L.[3]
Wu T.
2-66-26-0