Vilius Gaubas vs Dominic Stricker — Lugano CH Round of 32

Lugano CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
LTU7
Vilius Gaubas
#128ATP
1581ELO
1560Hard ELO
$275kYTD
$759kCAREER
21 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWWWLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 24 February 2025
hard
Dominic Stricker
SUI
Dominic Stricker
#360ATP
1533ELO
1509Hard ELO
23 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWLLWWLLL
Gaubas V.
6-3 1-6 6-2
Stricker D.
Gaubas V.
6162
Stricker D.
3621

Vilius Gaubas defeated Dominic Stricker 6-3 1-6 6-2 in the Lugano CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Vilius Gaubas came in ranked #128.

Key context

  • Match story: Vilius Gaubas closed it out in three sets, 6–3 1–6 6–2.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Gaubas V.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Stricker D.

Stricker D.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Gaubas V.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Gaubas V.Stricker D.
1st serve in·Slight edge
69%
58%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
65%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
52%
Service points won·Even
61%
64%
Return points won·Even
39%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
62%
57%
Aces / match·Clear edge
2.9
5.3
Double faults / match·Even
2.0
1.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (97 vs 40). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gaubas V.Stricker D.
Clutch Rating·Even
57
58
Break points saved·Slight edge
87
92
Break points won·Dominant
52
9
Deciding sets·Even
86
86
Tiebreaks·Dominant
7
74

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Gaubas V.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry Score
Stricker D.
4.4
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 23 days (−0.3)
Form & Matchup
6.0+51 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.0Hard Elo 1509
6.3Overall Elo 1581
ELO gap
3.7Overall Elo 1533
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
2.4
Surface form
2.1
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
0.0Lost last 5
Fatigue & Travel
7.1
Minutes 14d
4.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Gaubas V.Stricker D.
Freshness·Clear edge
70
88

Gaubas V.: 1 day rest · 3 matches, 73 games (7d) · Stricker D.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 18 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Coric B.[2]
Collignon R.[1]
6-36-1
Semi-finals
Collignon R.[1]
Cassone M.
7-634-66-3
Coric B.[2]
Prizmic D.
6-26-4
Quarter-finals
Collignon R.[1]
Draxl L.[8]
6-46-4
Cassone M.
Van Assche L.[3]
7-620-67-64
Prizmic D.
Gaubas V.[7]
6-26-3
Coric B.[2]
Squire H.[6]
6-26-2
R16
Collignon R.[1]
Durasovic V.
6-47-5
Gaubas V.[7]
Rottgering M.
6-727-56-4
Coric B.[2]
Escoffier A.
6-46-4
Draxl L.[8]
Ruusuvuori E.
6-47-62
Van Assche L.[3]
Choinski J.
6-36-1
Cassone M.
Grenier H.[5]
7-677-66
Squire H.[6]
Bertola R.
7-656-4
Prizmic D.
Blockx A.[4]
6-36-2
R32
Rottgering M.
Zhukayev B.
4-67-6107-65
Prizmic D.
Paul J.
6-36-2
Gaubas V.[7]
Stricker D.
6-31-66-2
Durasovic V.
Hassan B.
6-41-66-4
Ruusuvuori E.
Chidekh C.
6-33-66-4
Draxl L.[8]
Sakamoto R.
6-46-4
Choinski J.
Zahraj P.
6-26-736-3
Cassone M.
Berankis R.
6-16-2
Blockx A.[4]
Prado Angelo J.
6-26-3
Squire H.[6]
Andreev A.
6-37-5
Escoffier A.
Brunold M.
6-26-3
Bertola R.
Butvilas E.
2-67-57-64
Coric B.[2]
Onclin G.
6-46-2
Collignon R.[1]
Sachko V.
6-47-5
Grenier H.[5]
Cui J.
6-26-4
Van Assche L.[3]
Wu T.
2-66-26-0