Mees Rottgering vs Beibit Zhukayev — Lugano CH Round of 32

Lugano CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
NED
Mees Rottgering
#473ATP
1468ELO
1449Hard ELO
19 yrs · 180 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWWLLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 24 February 2025
hard
KAZ
Beibit Zhukayev
#387ATP
1455ELO
1402Hard ELO
25 yrs · 198 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLWLWWL
Rottgering M.
4-6 7-6 7-6
Zhukayev B.
Rottgering M.
4712772
Zhukayev B.
6610651

Mees Rottgering defeated Beibit Zhukayev 4-6 7-6 7-6 in the Lugano CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Rottgering M.serving82% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Zhukayev B.

Zhukayev B.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Rottgering M.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Rottgering M.Zhukayev B.
1st serve in·Even
58%
61%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
66%
76%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
49%
Service points won·Slight edge
58%
65%
Return points won·Slight edge
38%
33%
Break points saved·Slight edge
54%
65%
Aces / match·Dominant
3.1
11.2
Double faults / match·Even
3.5
3.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (18 vs 81). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Rottgering M.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Zhukayev B.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.7+47 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.3Hard Elo 1402
5.3Overall Elo 1468
ELO gap
4.7Overall Elo 1455
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
Surface form
5.0
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
8.7
Minutes 14d
7.5
7.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Coric B.[2]
Collignon R.[1]
6-36-1
Semi-finals
Collignon R.[1]
Cassone M.
7-634-66-3
Coric B.[2]
Prizmic D.
6-26-4
Quarter-finals
Collignon R.[1]
Draxl L.[8]
6-46-4
Cassone M.
Van Assche L.[3]
7-620-67-64
Prizmic D.
Gaubas V.[7]
6-26-3
Coric B.[2]
Squire H.[6]
6-26-2
R16
Collignon R.[1]
Durasovic V.
6-47-5
Gaubas V.[7]
Rottgering M.
6-727-56-4
Coric B.[2]
Escoffier A.
6-46-4
Draxl L.[8]
Ruusuvuori E.
6-47-62
Van Assche L.[3]
Choinski J.
6-36-1
Cassone M.
Grenier H.[5]
7-677-66
Squire H.[6]
Bertola R.
7-656-4
Prizmic D.
Blockx A.[4]
6-36-2
R32
Rottgering M.
Zhukayev B.
4-67-6107-65
Prizmic D.
Paul J.
6-36-2
Gaubas V.[7]
Stricker D.
6-31-66-2
Durasovic V.
Hassan B.
6-41-66-4
Ruusuvuori E.
Chidekh C.
6-33-66-4
Draxl L.[8]
Sakamoto R.
6-46-4
Choinski J.
Zahraj P.
6-26-736-3
Cassone M.
Berankis R.
6-16-2
Blockx A.[4]
Prado Angelo J.
6-26-3
Squire H.[6]
Andreev A.
6-37-5
Escoffier A.
Brunold M.
6-26-3
Bertola R.
Butvilas E.
2-67-57-64
Coric B.[2]
Onclin G.
6-46-2
Collignon R.[1]
Sachko V.
6-47-5
Grenier H.[5]
Cui J.
6-26-4
Van Assche L.[3]
Wu T.
2-66-26-0