Emil Ruusuvuori vs Clement Chidekh — Lugano CH Round of 32

Lugano CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
FIN
Emil Ruusuvuori
#787ATP
1606ELO
1577Hard ELO
27 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 24 February 2025
hard
FRA
Clement Chidekh
#207ATP
1513ELO
1523Hard ELO
$92kYTD
$401kCAREER
25 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLLLLW
Ruusuvuori E.
6-3 3-6 6-4
Chidekh C.
Ruusuvuori E.
6362
Chidekh C.
3641

Emil Ruusuvuori defeated Clement Chidekh 6-3 3-6 6-4 in the Lugano CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Emil Ruusuvuori closed it out in three sets, 6–3 3–6 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Ruusuvuori E.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Chidekh C.

Chidekh C.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Ruusuvuori E.

Serve advantage — Chidekh C.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Ruusuvuori E.Chidekh C.
1st serve in·Even
64%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
51%
Service points won·Even
63%
62%
Return points won·Slight edge
35%
41%
Break points saved·Even
62%
62%
Aces / match·Dominant
7.0
3.3
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.2
3.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (24 vs 82). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ruusuvuori E.Chidekh C.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
72
32
Break points saved·Clear edge
97
83
Break points won·Dominant
48
9
Deciding sets·Clear edge
80
59
Tiebreaks·Dominant
86
12

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Ruusuvuori E.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry Score
Chidekh C.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.2+54 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.8Hard Elo 1523
5.3Overall Elo 1606
ELO gap
4.7Overall Elo 1513
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.8
Surface form
4.2
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
8.0
Minutes 14d
5.7
7.0
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Ruusuvuori E.Chidekh C.
Freshness·
—
66

Chidekh C.: 2 days rest · 4 matches, 75 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Coric B.[2]
Collignon R.[1]
6-36-1
Semi-finals
Collignon R.[1]
Cassone M.
7-634-66-3
Coric B.[2]
Prizmic D.
6-26-4
Quarter-finals
Collignon R.[1]
Draxl L.[8]
6-46-4
Cassone M.
Van Assche L.[3]
7-620-67-64
Prizmic D.
Gaubas V.[7]
6-26-3
Coric B.[2]
Squire H.[6]
6-26-2
R16
Collignon R.[1]
Durasovic V.
6-47-5
Gaubas V.[7]
Rottgering M.
6-727-56-4
Coric B.[2]
Escoffier A.
6-46-4
Draxl L.[8]
Ruusuvuori E.
6-47-62
Van Assche L.[3]
Choinski J.
6-36-1
Cassone M.
Grenier H.[5]
7-677-66
Squire H.[6]
Bertola R.
7-656-4
Prizmic D.
Blockx A.[4]
6-36-2
R32
Rottgering M.
Zhukayev B.
4-67-6107-65
Prizmic D.
Paul J.
6-36-2
Gaubas V.[7]
Stricker D.
6-31-66-2
Durasovic V.
Hassan B.
6-41-66-4
Ruusuvuori E.
Chidekh C.
6-33-66-4
Draxl L.[8]
Sakamoto R.
6-46-4
Choinski J.
Zahraj P.
6-26-736-3
Cassone M.
Berankis R.
6-16-2
Blockx A.[4]
Prado Angelo J.
6-26-3
Squire H.[6]
Andreev A.
6-37-5
Escoffier A.
Brunold M.
6-26-3
Bertola R.
Butvilas E.
2-67-57-64
Coric B.[2]
Onclin G.
6-46-2
Collignon R.[1]
Sachko V.
6-47-5
Grenier H.[5]
Cui J.
6-26-4
Van Assche L.[3]
Wu T.
2-66-26-0