Borna Coric vs Dino Prizmic — Lugano CH Semi-final

Lugano CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
CRO2
Borna Coric
#855ATP
29 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 24 February 2025
hard
Dino Prizmic
CRO
Dino Prizmic
#84ATP
1841ELO
1733Hard ELO
$530kYTD
$1.3MCAREER
20 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWLLWLWWW
Coric B.
6-2 6-4
Prizmic D.
Coric B.
662
Prizmic D.
240

Borna Coric defeated Dino Prizmic 6-2 6-4 in the Lugano CH semi-final on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Dino Prizmic came in ranked #84.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Coric B.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Prizmic D.

Prizmic D.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Coric B.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Coric B.Prizmic D.
—
Serve
34
—
Return
20

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Coric B.Prizmic D.
1st serve in·Even
62%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
55%
54%
Service points won·Even
66%
65%
Return points won·Even
39%
41%
Break points saved·Even
60%
64%
Aces / match·Even
4.0
3.9
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.8
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (37 vs 83). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Coric B.Prizmic D.
Clutch Rating·Even
71
71
Break points saved·Slight edge
98
92
Break points won·Dominant
36
64
Deciding sets·Slight edge
84
92
Tiebreaks·Dominant
90
37

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Coric B.
4.7
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 28 days (−0.3)
Prizmic D.
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
0.0No prior meetings
H2H
10.0
3.2
Surface form
4.9
0.0Lost last 4
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
8.6
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Coric B.Prizmic D.
Freshness·
—
87

Prizmic D.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 16 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Coric B.[2]
Collignon R.[1]
6-36-1
Semi-finals
Collignon R.[1]
Cassone M.
7-634-66-3
Coric B.[2]
Prizmic D.
6-26-4
Quarter-finals
Collignon R.[1]
Draxl L.[8]
6-46-4
Cassone M.
Van Assche L.[3]
7-620-67-64
Prizmic D.
Gaubas V.[7]
6-26-3
Coric B.[2]
Squire H.[6]
6-26-2
R16
Collignon R.[1]
Durasovic V.
6-47-5
Gaubas V.[7]
Rottgering M.
6-727-56-4
Coric B.[2]
Escoffier A.
6-46-4
Draxl L.[8]
Ruusuvuori E.
6-47-62
Van Assche L.[3]
Choinski J.
6-36-1
Cassone M.
Grenier H.[5]
7-677-66
Squire H.[6]
Bertola R.
7-656-4
Prizmic D.
Blockx A.[4]
6-36-2
R32
Rottgering M.
Zhukayev B.
4-67-6107-65
Prizmic D.
Paul J.
6-36-2
Gaubas V.[7]
Stricker D.
6-31-66-2
Durasovic V.
Hassan B.
6-41-66-4
Ruusuvuori E.
Chidekh C.
6-33-66-4
Draxl L.[8]
Sakamoto R.
6-46-4
Choinski J.
Zahraj P.
6-26-736-3
Cassone M.
Berankis R.
6-16-2
Blockx A.[4]
Prado Angelo J.
6-26-3
Squire H.[6]
Andreev A.
6-37-5
Escoffier A.
Brunold M.
6-26-3
Bertola R.
Butvilas E.
2-67-57-64
Coric B.[2]
Onclin G.
6-46-2
Collignon R.[1]
Sachko V.
6-47-5
Grenier H.[5]
Cui J.
6-26-4
Van Assche L.[3]
Wu T.
2-66-26-0