Luca Van Assche vs Tung Lin Wu — Lugano CH Round of 32

Lugano CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Luca Van Assche
FRA3
Luca Van Assche
#86ATP
1701ELO
1681Hard ELO
$411kYTD
$2.6MCAREER
22 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWWWWWLWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 24 February 2025
hard
Tung Lin Wu
TPE
Tung Lin Wu
#329ATP
1406ELO
1376Hard ELO
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLLW
Van Assche L.
2-6 6-2 6-0
Wu T.
Van Assche L.
2662
Wu T.
6201

Luca Van Assche defeated Tung Lin Wu 2-6 6-2 6-0 in the Lugano CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Luca Van Assche came in ranked #86.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Van Assche L.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Wu T.

Wu T.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Van Assche L.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Van Assche L.Wu T.
1st serve in·Even
65%
68%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
52%
Service points won·Even
61%
64%
Return points won·Even
42%
40%
Break points saved·Slight edge
60%
65%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.1
3.7
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.0
1.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (94 vs 73). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Van Assche L.Wu T.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
68
10
Break points saved·Slight edge
91
84
Break points won·Dominant
61
6
Deciding sets·Dominant
81
6
Tiebreaks·Dominant
51
4

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Van Assche L.
5.1
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Wu T.
4.1
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 24 days (−0.3)
Form & Matchup
8.5+305 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
1.5Hard Elo 1376
8.4Overall Elo 1701
ELO gap
1.6Overall Elo 1406
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.4
Surface form
3.5
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
5.1
Minutes 14d
0.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Van Assche L.Wu T.
Freshness·Even
77
80

Van Assche L.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 30 games (7d) · Wu T.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 16 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Coric B.[2]
Collignon R.[1]
6-36-1
Semi-finals
Collignon R.[1]
Cassone M.
7-634-66-3
Coric B.[2]
Prizmic D.
6-26-4
Quarter-finals
Collignon R.[1]
Draxl L.[8]
6-46-4
Cassone M.
Van Assche L.[3]
7-620-67-64
Prizmic D.
Gaubas V.[7]
6-26-3
Coric B.[2]
Squire H.[6]
6-26-2
R16
Collignon R.[1]
Durasovic V.
6-47-5
Gaubas V.[7]
Rottgering M.
6-727-56-4
Coric B.[2]
Escoffier A.
6-46-4
Draxl L.[8]
Ruusuvuori E.
6-47-62
Van Assche L.[3]
Choinski J.
6-36-1
Cassone M.
Grenier H.[5]
7-677-66
Squire H.[6]
Bertola R.
7-656-4
Prizmic D.
Blockx A.[4]
6-36-2
R32
Rottgering M.
Zhukayev B.
4-67-6107-65
Prizmic D.
Paul J.
6-36-2
Gaubas V.[7]
Stricker D.
6-31-66-2
Durasovic V.
Hassan B.
6-41-66-4
Ruusuvuori E.
Chidekh C.
6-33-66-4
Draxl L.[8]
Sakamoto R.
6-46-4
Choinski J.
Zahraj P.
6-26-736-3
Cassone M.
Berankis R.
6-16-2
Blockx A.[4]
Prado Angelo J.
6-26-3
Squire H.[6]
Andreev A.
6-37-5
Escoffier A.
Brunold M.
6-26-3
Bertola R.
Butvilas E.
2-67-57-64
Coric B.[2]
Onclin G.
6-46-2
Collignon R.[1]
Sachko V.
6-47-5
Grenier H.[5]
Cui J.
6-26-4
Van Assche L.[3]
Wu T.
2-66-26-0