Brandon Holt vs Yu Hsiou Hsu — Guangzhou CH Quarter-final

Guangzhou CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
USA2
Brandon Holt
#657ATP
1537ELO
1507Hard ELO
28 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 28 April 2025
hard
Yu Hsiou Hsu
TPE
Yu Hsiou Hsu
#210ATP
1489ELO
1468Hard ELO
27 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLWLW
Holt B.
6-4 6-3
Hsu Y.
Holt B.
662
Hsu Y.
430

Brandon Holt defeated Yu Hsiou Hsu 6-4 6-3 in the Guangzhou CH quarter-final on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Yu Hsiou Hsu came in ranked #210, defending last year's quarter-final.

Key context

  • Match story: Brandon Holt closed it out in two sets, 6–4 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Holt B.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Hsu Y.

Hsu Y.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Holt B.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Holt B.Hsu Y.
1st serve in·Even
68%
66%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
51%
Service points won·Even
64%
61%
Return points won·Even
38%
40%
Break points saved·Even
61%
59%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.5
2.9
Double faults / match·Clear edge
0.9
2.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (75 vs 80). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Holt B.Hsu Y.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
58
36
Break points saved·Slight edge
85
74
Break points won·Dominant
31
4
Deciding sets·Dominant
79
50
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
69
77

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Holt B.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Hsu Y.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.2+39 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.8Hard Elo 1468
5.2Overall Elo 1537
ELO gap
4.8Overall Elo 1489
5.8No prior meetings
H2H
4.2
6.2
Surface form
6.1
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
1.9
Minutes 14d
5.2
0.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
7.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Holt B.Hsu Y.
Freshness·
—
100

Hsu Y.: 21 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Atmane T.[4]
Schoolkate T.[3]
6-37-64
Semi-finals
Schoolkate T.[3]
Kachmazov A.
6-36-746-4
Atmane T.[4]
Holt B.[2]
6-46-3
Quarter-finals
Schoolkate T.[3]
Grenier H.[6]
6-46-4
Atmane T.[4]
Simakin I.
1-67-647-5
Holt B.[2]
Hsu Y.
6-46-3
Kachmazov A.
Mccabe J.[7]
7-656-4
R16
Kachmazov A.
Walton A.[1]
4-67-626-2
Mccabe J.[7]
Jasika O.
6-41-66-2
Grenier H.[6]
Bouzige M.
6-47-5
Atmane T.[4]
Sharipov M.
7-57-63
Hsu Y.
Escoffier A.
6-33-66-2
Simakin I.
Watanuki Y.
6-47-66
Schoolkate T.[3]
Shimabukuro S.
6-20-0
Holt B.[2]
Cui J.
7-677-64
R32
Holt B.[2]
Noguchi R.
7-637-62
Walton A.[1]
Ilagan A.
6-37-63
Kachmazov A.
Sun F.
6-47-65
Jasika O.
Langmo C.
6-47-65
Mccabe J.[7]
Samrej K.
6-36-736-3
Shimabukuro S.
Bolt A.
3-66-46-1
Bouzige M.
Roh H.
6-36-1
Watanuki Y.
Tu L.[5]
6-46-786-3
Simakin I.
Mo Y.
6-17-63
Escoffier A.
Svajda Z.
6-46-4
Atmane T.[4]
Te R.
5-76-36-1
Hsu Y.
Lestienne C.[8]
7-56-4
Cui J.
Zhou Y.
6-46-4
Schoolkate T.[3]
Peniston R.
6-44-66-4
Grenier H.[6]
Chen C.
6-26-4
Sharipov M.
Rosenkranz M.
6-33-66-4