Terence Atmane vs Brandon Holt — Guangzhou CH Semi-final

Guangzhou CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
Terence Atmane
FRA4
Terence Atmane
#50ATP
1704ELO
1674Hard ELO
$707kYTD
$2.2MCAREER
24 yrs · 193 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 28 April 2025
hard
USA2
Brandon Holt
#657ATP
1537ELO
1507Hard ELO
28 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLLWW
Atmane T.
6-4 6-3
Holt B.
Atmane T.
662
Holt B.
430

Terence Atmane defeated Brandon Holt 6-4 6-3 in the Guangzhou CH semi-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Terence Atmane came in ranked #50, defending last year's quarter-final. Terence Atmane claimed a first win over Brandon Holt in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2024-02-19Los CabosQ1hardBrandon Holt6-4 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Atmane T.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Holt B.

Holt B.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Atmane T.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Atmane T.Holt B.
37
Serve
—
27
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Atmane T.Holt B.
1st serve in·Slight edge
60%
68%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
74%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
53%
Service points won·Even
65%
64%
Return points won·Even
35%
38%
Break points saved·Even
63%
62%
Aces / match·Clear edge
7.7
5.5
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.5
0.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (85 vs 75). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Atmane T.Holt B.
Clutch Rating·Even
56
58
Break points saved·Slight edge
95
85
Break points won·Slight edge
25
31
Deciding sets·Dominant
54
79
Tiebreaks·Dominant
96
69

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Atmane T.
5.4
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Holt B.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.3+166 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.7Hard Elo 1507
7.6Overall Elo 1704
ELO gap
2.4Overall Elo 1537
3.1
H2H
6.9
6.4
Surface form
6.2
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
3.0
Minutes 14d
1.9
0.0
3-set count
0.0
9.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
7.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Atmane T.Holt B.
Freshness·
96
—

Atmane T.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Atmane T.[4]
Schoolkate T.[3]
6-37-64
Semi-finals
Schoolkate T.[3]
Kachmazov A.
6-36-746-4
Atmane T.[4]
Holt B.[2]
6-46-3
Quarter-finals
Schoolkate T.[3]
Grenier H.[6]
6-46-4
Atmane T.[4]
Simakin I.
1-67-647-5
Holt B.[2]
Hsu Y.
6-46-3
Kachmazov A.
Mccabe J.[7]
7-656-4
R16
Kachmazov A.
Walton A.[1]
4-67-626-2
Mccabe J.[7]
Jasika O.
6-41-66-2
Grenier H.[6]
Bouzige M.
6-47-5
Atmane T.[4]
Sharipov M.
7-57-63
Hsu Y.
Escoffier A.
6-33-66-2
Simakin I.
Watanuki Y.
6-47-66
Schoolkate T.[3]
Shimabukuro S.
6-20-0
Holt B.[2]
Cui J.
7-677-64
R32
Holt B.[2]
Noguchi R.
7-637-62
Walton A.[1]
Ilagan A.
6-37-63
Kachmazov A.
Sun F.
6-47-65
Jasika O.
Langmo C.
6-47-65
Mccabe J.[7]
Samrej K.
6-36-736-3
Shimabukuro S.
Bolt A.
3-66-46-1
Bouzige M.
Roh H.
6-36-1
Watanuki Y.
Tu L.[5]
6-46-786-3
Simakin I.
Mo Y.
6-17-63
Escoffier A.
Svajda Z.
6-46-4
Atmane T.[4]
Te R.
5-76-36-1
Hsu Y.
Lestienne C.[8]
7-56-4
Cui J.
Zhou Y.
6-46-4
Schoolkate T.[3]
Peniston R.
6-44-66-4
Grenier H.[6]
Chen C.
6-26-4
Sharipov M.
Rosenkranz M.
6-33-66-4