Adam Walton vs Andre Ilagan — Guangzhou CH Round of 32

Guangzhou CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Adam Walton
AUS1
Adam Walton
#79ATP
1703ELO
1669Hard ELO
$499kYTD
$2.3MCAREER
27 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 28 April 2025
hard
USA
Andre Ilagan
#253ATP
1543ELO
1518Hard ELO
25 yrs · 173 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLWWWW
Walton A.
6-3 7-6
Ilagan A.
Walton A.
6772
Ilagan A.
3630

Adam Walton defeated Andre Ilagan 6-3 7-6 in the Guangzhou CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Adam Walton came in ranked #79, defending last year's final.

Key context

  • Match story: Adam Walton closed it out in two sets, 6–3 7–6.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Walton A.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Ilagan A.

Ilagan A.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Walton A.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Walton A.Ilagan A.
35
Serve
—
27
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Walton A.Ilagan A.
1st serve in·Even
64%
66%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
52%
Service points won·Even
65%
62%
Return points won·Even
36%
40%
Break points saved·Even
62%
63%
Aces / match·Dominant
6.7
3.4
Double faults / match·Even
2.0
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (108 vs 91). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Walton A.Ilagan A.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
65
37
Break points saved·Clear edge
95
76
Break points won·Even
20
17
Deciding sets·Clear edge
95
71
Tiebreaks·Dominant
70
14

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Walton A.
7.9
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Ilagan A.
5.1
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.7+151 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.3Hard Elo 1518
7.9Overall Elo 1703
ELO gap
2.1Overall Elo 1543
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
6.8
Surface form
4.6
Fatigue & Travel
2.2
Minutes 14d
6.6
4.0
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Walton A.Ilagan A.
Freshness·Clear edge
46
68

Walton A.: 1 day rest · 5 matches, 122 games (7d) · Ilagan A.: 4 days rest · 3 matches, 80 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Atmane T.[4]
Schoolkate T.[3]
6-37-64
Semi-finals
Schoolkate T.[3]
Kachmazov A.
6-36-746-4
Atmane T.[4]
Holt B.[2]
6-46-3
Quarter-finals
Schoolkate T.[3]
Grenier H.[6]
6-46-4
Atmane T.[4]
Simakin I.
1-67-647-5
Holt B.[2]
Hsu Y.
6-46-3
Kachmazov A.
Mccabe J.[7]
7-656-4
R16
Kachmazov A.
Walton A.[1]
4-67-626-2
Mccabe J.[7]
Jasika O.
6-41-66-2
Grenier H.[6]
Bouzige M.
6-47-5
Atmane T.[4]
Sharipov M.
7-57-63
Hsu Y.
Escoffier A.
6-33-66-2
Simakin I.
Watanuki Y.
6-47-66
Schoolkate T.[3]
Shimabukuro S.
6-20-0
Holt B.[2]
Cui J.
7-677-64
R32
Holt B.[2]
Noguchi R.
7-637-62
Walton A.[1]
Ilagan A.
6-37-63
Kachmazov A.
Sun F.
6-47-65
Jasika O.
Langmo C.
6-47-65
Mccabe J.[7]
Samrej K.
6-36-736-3
Shimabukuro S.
Bolt A.
3-66-46-1
Bouzige M.
Roh H.
6-36-1
Watanuki Y.
Tu L.[5]
6-46-786-3
Simakin I.
Mo Y.
6-17-63
Escoffier A.
Svajda Z.
6-46-4
Atmane T.[4]
Te R.
5-76-36-1
Hsu Y.
Lestienne C.[8]
7-56-4
Cui J.
Zhou Y.
6-46-4
Schoolkate T.[3]
Peniston R.
6-44-66-4
Grenier H.[6]
Chen C.
6-26-4
Sharipov M.
Rosenkranz M.
6-33-66-4