James Mccabe vs Omar Jasika — Guangzhou CH Round of 16

Guangzhou CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
AUS7
James Mccabe
#242ATP
1532ELO
1481Hard ELO
23 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 28 April 2025
hard
AUS
Omar Jasika
#528ATP
1296ELO
1272Hard ELO
29 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWLLL
Mccabe J.
6-4 1-6 6-2
Jasika O.
Mccabe J.
6162
Jasika O.
4621

James Mccabe defeated Omar Jasika 6-4 1-6 6-2 in the Guangzhou CH round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — James Mccabe came in ranked #242, defending last year's round of 16.

Key context

  • Match story: James Mccabe closed it out in three sets, 6–4 1–6 6–2.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Mccabe J.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Jasika O.

Jasika O.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Mccabe J.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Mccabe J.Jasika O.
1st serve in·Slight edge
61%
66%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
73%
63%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
49%
Service points won·Even
63%
59%
Return points won·Even
35%
37%
Break points saved·Even
61%
58%
Aces / match·Dominant
8.6
2.7
Double faults / match·Even
2.5
2.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (90 vs 64). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Mccabe J.Jasika O.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
37
0
Break points saved·Dominant
85
47
Break points won·Even
9
13
Deciding sets·Dominant
71
13
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
12
1

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Mccabe J.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Jasika O.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.1+210 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.9Hard Elo 1272
7.3Overall Elo 1532
ELO gap
2.7Overall Elo 1296
6.1No prior meetings
H2H
3.9
4.2
Surface form
6.2
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
7.5
Minutes 14d
3.9
3-set count
0.0
7.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Mccabe J.Jasika O.
Freshness·
94
—

Mccabe J.: 5 days rest · 1 match, 19 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Atmane T.[4]
Schoolkate T.[3]
6-37-64
Semi-finals
Schoolkate T.[3]
Kachmazov A.
6-36-746-4
Atmane T.[4]
Holt B.[2]
6-46-3
Quarter-finals
Schoolkate T.[3]
Grenier H.[6]
6-46-4
Atmane T.[4]
Simakin I.
1-67-647-5
Holt B.[2]
Hsu Y.
6-46-3
Kachmazov A.
Mccabe J.[7]
7-656-4
R16
Kachmazov A.
Walton A.[1]
4-67-626-2
Mccabe J.[7]
Jasika O.
6-41-66-2
Grenier H.[6]
Bouzige M.
6-47-5
Atmane T.[4]
Sharipov M.
7-57-63
Hsu Y.
Escoffier A.
6-33-66-2
Simakin I.
Watanuki Y.
6-47-66
Schoolkate T.[3]
Shimabukuro S.
6-20-0
Holt B.[2]
Cui J.
7-677-64
R32
Holt B.[2]
Noguchi R.
7-637-62
Walton A.[1]
Ilagan A.
6-37-63
Kachmazov A.
Sun F.
6-47-65
Jasika O.
Langmo C.
6-47-65
Mccabe J.[7]
Samrej K.
6-36-736-3
Shimabukuro S.
Bolt A.
3-66-46-1
Bouzige M.
Roh H.
6-36-1
Watanuki Y.
Tu L.[5]
6-46-786-3
Simakin I.
Mo Y.
6-17-63
Escoffier A.
Svajda Z.
6-46-4
Atmane T.[4]
Te R.
5-76-36-1
Hsu Y.
Lestienne C.[8]
7-56-4
Cui J.
Zhou Y.
6-46-4
Schoolkate T.[3]
Peniston R.
6-44-66-4
Grenier H.[6]
Chen C.
6-26-4
Sharipov M.
Rosenkranz M.
6-33-66-4