Rafael Jodar vs Martin Damm — Lincoln CH Final

Lincoln CH · CHALLENGER · Final
Rafael Jodar
ESP
Rafael Jodar
#25ATP
1999ELO
1873Hard ELO
$1.6MYTD
$1.9MCAREER
19 yrs · 191 cm
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWWWWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 13 October 2025
hard
Martin Damm
USA8
Martin Damm
#104ATP
1706ELO
1657Hard ELO
$338kYTD
$910kCAREER
22 yrs · 203 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWWWL
Jodar R.
6-7 6-3 6-3
Damm M.
Jodar R.
63662
Damm M.
77331

Rafael Jodar defeated Martin Damm 6-7 6-3 6-3 in the Lincoln CH final on hard. The result followed the form book — Rafael Jodar came in ranked #25.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Jodar R.serving91% hold

wins 71% of points on serve vs Damm M.

Damm M.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Jodar R.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Jodar R.Damm M.
19
Serve
—
45
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Jodar R.Damm M.
1st serve in·Even
62%
62%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
71%
80%
2nd serve points won·Even
55%
52%
Service points won·Slight edge
65%
70%
Return points won·Slight edge
42%
33%
Break points saved·Slight edge
60%
65%
Aces / match·Dominant
3.8
12.8
Double faults / match·Dominant
1.7
4.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (92 vs 73). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Jodar R.Damm M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
86
26
Break points saved·Even
91
93
Break points won·Dominant
71
1
Deciding sets·Dominant
100
5
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
93
84

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Jodar R.
7.6
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Damm M.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.7+216 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.3Hard Elo 1657
8.7Overall Elo 1999
ELO gap
1.3Overall Elo 1706
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.9
Surface form
6.0
7.03-match win streak
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
6.2
Minutes 14d
8.8
7.0
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Jodar R.Damm M.
Freshness·Slight edge
89
97

Jodar R.: 11 days rest · 2 matches (14d) · Damm M.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Jodar R.
Damm M.[8]
6-736-36-3
Semi-finals
Jodar R.
Kypson P.[4]
6-36-3
Damm M.[8]
Monday J.[7]
6-46-4
Quarter-finals
Jodar R.
Holt B.[1]
6-07-5
Kypson P.[4]
Suresh D.
7-646-0
Damm M.[8]
Ilagan A.
4-66-37-64
Monday J.[7]
Mmoh M.
6-36-3
R16
Holt B.[1]
Smith K.
3-66-26-1
Kypson P.[4]
Banerjee S.
6-47-65
Suresh D.
Perez A.
6-47-65
Mmoh M.
Pinnington Jones J.[3]
6-37-64
Monday J.[7]
Ghibaudo A.
6-46-2
Damm M.[8]
Tarvet O.
7-57-5
Jodar R.
Wiskandt M.
6-46-1
Ilagan A.
Martin A.
7-616-2
R32
Holt B.[1]
Shah A.
4-66-44-1
Jodar R.
Kingsley C.
6-37-5
Wiskandt M.
Hassan B.[5]
6-36-4
Kypson P.[4]
Rosenkranz M.
6-26-4
Banerjee S.
Ganesan A.
7-53-67-64
Suresh D.
Rybakov A.
6-46-4
Perez A.
Popko D.[6]
6-46-4
Monday J.[7]
Zink T.
6-46-4
Ghibaudo A.
Zick S.
6-37-63
Pinnington Jones J.[3]
Krueger M.
7-666-1
Tarvet O.
Friend J.
6-46-0
Martin A.
Fenty A.
6-36-3
Ilagan A.
Cassone M.[2]
1-66-26-3
Damm M.[8]
Arseneault N.
4-67-646-4
Mmoh M.
Wallin O.
6-46-2
Smith K.
Lassila J.
6-36-2