Martin Damm vs Andre Ilagan — Lincoln CH Quarter-final

Lincoln CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Martin Damm
USA8
Martin Damm
#104ATP
1706ELO
1657Hard ELO
$338kYTD
$910kCAREER
22 yrs · 203 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 13 October 2025
hard
USA
Andre Ilagan
#253ATP
1543ELO
1518Hard ELO
25 yrs · 173 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLWWWW
Damm M.
4-6 6-3 7-6
Ilagan A.
Damm M.
46772
Ilagan A.
63641

Martin Damm defeated Andre Ilagan 4-6 6-3 7-6 in the Lincoln CH quarter-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Martin Damm came in ranked #104.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Damm M.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Ilagan A.

Ilagan A.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Damm M.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Damm M.Ilagan A.
1st serve in·Even
62%
66%
1st serve points won·Clear edge
80%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
52%
Service points won·Slight edge
70%
62%
Return points won·Slight edge
33%
40%
Break points saved·Even
65%
63%
Aces / match·Dominant
12.7
3.4
Double faults / match·Dominant
4.0
2.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (73 vs 91). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Damm M.Ilagan A.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
26
37
Break points saved·Clear edge
93
76
Break points won·Clear edge
1
17
Deciding sets·Dominant
5
71
Tiebreaks·Dominant
84
14

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Damm M.
7.2
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Ilagan A.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.9+138 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.1Hard Elo 1518
8.0Overall Elo 1706
ELO gap
2.0Overall Elo 1543
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.0
Surface form
6.7
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
8.8
Minutes 14d
1.6
7.0
3-set count
0.0
7.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Damm M.Ilagan A.
Freshness·Clear edge
92
68

Damm M.: 12 days rest · 2 matches (14d) · Ilagan A.: 4 days rest · 3 matches, 80 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Jodar R.
Damm M.[8]
6-736-36-3
Semi-finals
Jodar R.
Kypson P.[4]
6-36-3
Damm M.[8]
Monday J.[7]
6-46-4
Quarter-finals
Jodar R.
Holt B.[1]
6-07-5
Kypson P.[4]
Suresh D.
7-646-0
Damm M.[8]
Ilagan A.
4-66-37-64
Monday J.[7]
Mmoh M.
6-36-3
R16
Holt B.[1]
Smith K.
3-66-26-1
Kypson P.[4]
Banerjee S.
6-47-65
Suresh D.
Perez A.
6-47-65
Mmoh M.
Pinnington Jones J.[3]
6-37-64
Monday J.[7]
Ghibaudo A.
6-46-2
Damm M.[8]
Tarvet O.
7-57-5
Jodar R.
Wiskandt M.
6-46-1
Ilagan A.
Martin A.
7-616-2
R32
Holt B.[1]
Shah A.
4-66-44-1
Jodar R.
Kingsley C.
6-37-5
Wiskandt M.
Hassan B.[5]
6-36-4
Kypson P.[4]
Rosenkranz M.
6-26-4
Banerjee S.
Ganesan A.
7-53-67-64
Suresh D.
Rybakov A.
6-46-4
Perez A.
Popko D.[6]
6-46-4
Monday J.[7]
Zink T.
6-46-4
Ghibaudo A.
Zick S.
6-37-63
Pinnington Jones J.[3]
Krueger M.
7-666-1
Tarvet O.
Friend J.
6-46-0
Martin A.
Fenty A.
6-36-3
Ilagan A.
Cassone M.[2]
1-66-26-3
Damm M.[8]
Arseneault N.
4-67-646-4
Mmoh M.
Wallin O.
6-46-2
Smith K.
Lassila J.
6-36-2