Rafael Jodar vs Brandon Holt — Lincoln CH Quarter-final

Lincoln CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Rafael Jodar
ESP
Rafael Jodar
#26ATP
1999ELO
1873Hard ELO
$1.6MYTD
$1.9MCAREER
19 yrs · 191 cm
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWWWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 13 October 2025
hard
USA1
Brandon Holt
#558ATP
1537ELO
1507Hard ELO
28 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLWWL
Jodar R.
6-0 7-5
Holt B.
Jodar R.
672
Holt B.
050

Rafael Jodar defeated Brandon Holt 6-0 7-5 in the Lincoln CH quarter-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Rafael Jodar came in ranked #26.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Jodar R.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Holt B.

Holt B.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Jodar R.

Serve advantage — Jodar R.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Jodar R.Holt B.
18
Serve
—
44
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Jodar R.Holt B.
1st serve in·Slight edge
62%
68%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
55%
53%
Service points won·Even
65%
64%
Return points won·Even
42%
38%
Break points saved·Even
61%
62%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.9
5.5
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.7
0.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (92 vs 75). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Jodar R.Holt B.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
86
58
Break points saved·Slight edge
91
85
Break points won·Dominant
71
31
Deciding sets·Clear edge
100
79
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
93
69

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Jodar R.
8.0
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Holt B.
4.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
9.5+366 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
0.5Hard Elo 1507
10.0Overall Elo 1999
ELO gap
0.0Overall Elo 1537
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.9
Surface form
4.2
7.03-match win streak
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
6.2
Minutes 14d
5.7
7.0
3-set count
4.0
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Jodar R.Holt B.
Freshness·
79
—

Jodar R.: 8 days rest · 3 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Jodar R.
Damm M.[8]
6-736-36-3
Semi-finals
Jodar R.
Kypson P.[4]
6-36-3
Damm M.[8]
Monday J.[7]
6-46-4
Quarter-finals
Jodar R.
Holt B.[1]
6-07-5
Kypson P.[4]
Suresh D.
7-646-0
Damm M.[8]
Ilagan A.
4-66-37-64
Monday J.[7]
Mmoh M.
6-36-3
R16
Holt B.[1]
Smith K.
3-66-26-1
Kypson P.[4]
Banerjee S.
6-47-65
Suresh D.
Perez A.
6-47-65
Mmoh M.
Pinnington Jones J.[3]
6-37-64
Monday J.[7]
Ghibaudo A.
6-46-2
Damm M.[8]
Tarvet O.
7-57-5
Jodar R.
Wiskandt M.
6-46-1
Ilagan A.
Martin A.
7-616-2
R32
Holt B.[1]
Shah A.
4-66-44-1
Jodar R.
Kingsley C.
6-37-5
Wiskandt M.
Hassan B.[5]
6-36-4
Kypson P.[4]
Rosenkranz M.
6-26-4
Banerjee S.
Ganesan A.
7-53-67-64
Suresh D.
Rybakov A.
6-46-4
Perez A.
Popko D.[6]
6-46-4
Monday J.[7]
Zink T.
6-46-4
Ghibaudo A.
Zick S.
6-37-63
Pinnington Jones J.[3]
Krueger M.
7-666-1
Tarvet O.
Friend J.
6-46-0
Martin A.
Fenty A.
6-36-3
Ilagan A.
Cassone M.[2]
1-66-26-3
Damm M.[8]
Arseneault N.
4-67-646-4
Mmoh M.
Wallin O.
6-46-2
Smith K.
Lassila J.
6-36-2