Patrick Kypson vs Mats Rosenkranz — Lincoln CH Round of 32

Lincoln CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Patrick Kypson
USA4
Patrick Kypson
#112ATP
1641ELO
1611Hard ELO
$260kYTD
$1.1MCAREER
26 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLLWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 13 October 2025
hard
GER
Mats Rosenkranz
#358ATP
1454ELO
1424Hard ELO
27 yrs · 193 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWLWWLW
Kypson P.
6-2 6-4
Rosenkranz M.
Kypson P.
662
Rosenkranz M.
240

Patrick Kypson defeated Mats Rosenkranz 6-2 6-4 in the Lincoln CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Patrick Kypson came in ranked #112.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Kypson P.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Rosenkranz M.

Rosenkranz M.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Kypson P.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Kypson P.Rosenkranz M.
1st serve in·Even
64%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
75%
74%
2nd serve points won·Even
54%
51%
Service points won·Even
67%
65%
Return points won·Even
37%
37%
Break points saved·Even
68%
67%
Aces / match·Slight edge
7.2
6.3
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.1
3.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (82 vs 56). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Kypson P.Rosenkranz M.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
42
31
Break points saved·Slight edge
93
86
Break points won·Dominant
41
1
Deciding sets·Dominant
17
64
Tiebreaks·Dominant
77
6

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Kypson P.
6.8
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Rosenkranz M.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.2+187 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.8Hard Elo 1424
7.1Overall Elo 1641
ELO gap
2.9Overall Elo 1454
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.4
Surface form
5.4
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
4.3
3-set count
4.0
8.0
Prev. match
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Kypson P.Rosenkranz M.
Freshness·
93
—

Kypson P.: 11 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Jodar R.
Damm M.[8]
6-736-36-3
Semi-finals
Jodar R.
Kypson P.[4]
6-36-3
Damm M.[8]
Monday J.[7]
6-46-4
Quarter-finals
Jodar R.
Holt B.[1]
6-07-5
Kypson P.[4]
Suresh D.
7-646-0
Damm M.[8]
Ilagan A.
4-66-37-64
Monday J.[7]
Mmoh M.
6-36-3
R16
Holt B.[1]
Smith K.
3-66-26-1
Kypson P.[4]
Banerjee S.
6-47-65
Suresh D.
Perez A.
6-47-65
Mmoh M.
Pinnington Jones J.[3]
6-37-64
Monday J.[7]
Ghibaudo A.
6-46-2
Damm M.[8]
Tarvet O.
7-57-5
Jodar R.
Wiskandt M.
6-46-1
Ilagan A.
Martin A.
7-616-2
R32
Holt B.[1]
Shah A.
4-66-44-1
Jodar R.
Kingsley C.
6-37-5
Wiskandt M.
Hassan B.[5]
6-36-4
Kypson P.[4]
Rosenkranz M.
6-26-4
Banerjee S.
Ganesan A.
7-53-67-64
Suresh D.
Rybakov A.
6-46-4
Perez A.
Popko D.[6]
6-46-4
Monday J.[7]
Zink T.
6-46-4
Ghibaudo A.
Zick S.
6-37-63
Pinnington Jones J.[3]
Krueger M.
7-666-1
Tarvet O.
Friend J.
6-46-0
Martin A.
Fenty A.
6-36-3
Ilagan A.
Cassone M.[2]
1-66-26-3
Damm M.[8]
Arseneault N.
4-67-646-4
Mmoh M.
Wallin O.
6-46-2
Smith K.
Lassila J.
6-36-2