Max Purcell vs Sasi Kumar Mukund — Chennai CH Round of 32

Chennai CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
AUS
Max Purcell
28 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 13 February 2023
hard
IND
Sasi Kumar Mukund
1306ELO
1281Hard ELO
29 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLWLLL
Purcell M.
6-2 6-2
Mukund S.
Purcell M.
662
Mukund S.
220

Max Purcell defeated Sasi Kumar Mukund 6-2 6-2 in the Chennai CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Purcell M.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Mukund S.

Mukund S.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Purcell M.

Serve advantage — Purcell M.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Purcell M.Mukund S.
1st serve in·Even
59%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
49%
Service points won·Even
64%
61%
Return points won·Even
37%
36%
Break points saved·Slight edge
63%
57%
Aces / match·Slight edge
7.5
6.4
Double faults / match·Even
2.1
2.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (124 vs 94). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Purcell M.Mukund S.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
59
0
Break points saved·Dominant
92
20
Break points won·Slight edge
10
5
Deciding sets·Dominant
84
13
Tiebreaks·Dominant
81
56

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Purcell M.
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Mukund S.
4.6
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 35 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.5
Surface form
3.5
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
7.8
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Purcell M.
Moreno De Alboran N.
5-77-626-4
Semi-finals
Purcell M.
Sweeny D.
6-47-63
Moreno De Alboran N.
Nagal S.
6-46-2
Quarter-finals
Nagal S.
Clarke J.
6-16-4
Sweeny D.
Cazaux A.
6-757-696-3
Moreno De Alboran N.
Uchiyama Y.
6-36-4
Purcell M.
Duckworth J.[2]
6-44-66-4
R16
Uchiyama Y.
Svrcina D.[7]
6-16-7106-4
Sweeny D.
Mccabe J.
6-26-1
Cazaux A.
Hong S.
6-36-4
Clarke J.
Kuzmanov D.[8]
3-66-36-4
Nagal S.
Jung J.
3-66-26-0
Moreno De Alboran N.
Tseng C.[1]
6-26-4
Purcell M.
Nouza P.
7-56-3
Duckworth J.[2]
Medjedovic H.
6-27-63
R32
Sweeny D.
Maestrelli F.
6-36-4
Duckworth J.[2]
Sanchez Jover C.
6-46-2
Uchiyama Y.
Polmans M.
6-47-65
Medjedovic H.
Borg L.
6-14-66-2
Purcell M.
Mukund S.
6-26-2
Nouza P.
Nardi L.[5]
6-47-5
Mccabe J.
Hsu Y.
6-16-4
Kuzmanov D.[8]
Ramanathan R.
6-37-63
Clarke J.
Gunneswaran P.
4-66-37-64
Jung J.
Mayot H.
6-31-67-65
Nagal S.
Peniston R.[4]
6-46-4
Svrcina D.[7]
Kachmazov A.
6-26-3
Moreno De Alboran N.
Ferreira Silva F.
6-36-2
Cazaux A.
Ly N.
6-36-2
Tseng C.[1]
Serdarusic N.
6-47-66
Hong S.
Ofner S.[3]
6-46-3