Chun Hsin Tseng vs Nino Serdarusic — Chennai CH Round of 32

Chennai CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Chun Hsin Tseng
TPE1
Chun Hsin Tseng
#234ATP
1554ELO
1495Hard ELO
$99kYTD
$1.7MCAREER
24 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 13 February 2023
hard
CRO
Nino Serdarusic
#1471ATP
29 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLLLWLL
Tseng C.
6-4 7-6
Serdarusic N.
Tseng C.
6782
Serdarusic N.
4660

Chun Hsin Tseng defeated Nino Serdarusic 6-4 7-6 in the Chennai CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Tseng C.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Serdarusic N.

Serdarusic N.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Tseng C.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Tseng C.Serdarusic N.
1st serve in·Slight edge
58%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
49%
Service points won·Even
61%
63%
Return points won·Even
39%
36%
Break points saved·Even
61%
58%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.0
4.5
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.2
1.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 93). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Tseng C.Serdarusic N.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
26
8
Break points saved·Clear edge
83
66
Break points won·Slight edge
15
5
Deciding sets·Clear edge
31
10
Tiebreaks·Even
23
23

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Tseng C.
5.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Serdarusic N.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
0.0
Surface form
2.2
0.0Lost last 10
Win streak
0.0Lost last 5
Fatigue & Travel
8.9
Minutes 14d
9.2
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Purcell M.
Moreno De Alboran N.
5-77-626-4
Semi-finals
Purcell M.
Sweeny D.
6-47-63
Moreno De Alboran N.
Nagal S.
6-46-2
Quarter-finals
Nagal S.
Clarke J.
6-16-4
Sweeny D.
Cazaux A.
6-757-696-3
Moreno De Alboran N.
Uchiyama Y.
6-36-4
Purcell M.
Duckworth J.[2]
6-44-66-4
R16
Uchiyama Y.
Svrcina D.[7]
6-16-7106-4
Sweeny D.
Mccabe J.
6-26-1
Cazaux A.
Hong S.
6-36-4
Clarke J.
Kuzmanov D.[8]
3-66-36-4
Nagal S.
Jung J.
3-66-26-0
Moreno De Alboran N.
Tseng C.[1]
6-26-4
Purcell M.
Nouza P.
7-56-3
Duckworth J.[2]
Medjedovic H.
6-27-63
R32
Sweeny D.
Maestrelli F.
6-36-4
Duckworth J.[2]
Sanchez Jover C.
6-46-2
Uchiyama Y.
Polmans M.
6-47-65
Medjedovic H.
Borg L.
6-14-66-2
Purcell M.
Mukund S.
6-26-2
Nouza P.
Nardi L.[5]
6-47-5
Mccabe J.
Hsu Y.
6-16-4
Kuzmanov D.[8]
Ramanathan R.
6-37-63
Clarke J.
Gunneswaran P.
4-66-37-64
Jung J.
Mayot H.
6-31-67-65
Nagal S.
Peniston R.[4]
6-46-4
Svrcina D.[7]
Kachmazov A.
6-26-3
Moreno De Alboran N.
Ferreira Silva F.
6-36-2
Cazaux A.
Ly N.
6-36-2
Tseng C.[1]
Serdarusic N.
6-47-66
Hong S.
Ofner S.[3]
6-46-3