Arthur Cazaux vs Seong Chan Hong — Chennai CH Round of 16

Chennai CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Arthur Cazaux
FRA
Arthur Cazaux
#98ATP
1793ELO
1738Hard ELO
$46kYTD
$2.3MCAREER
23 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 13 February 2023
hard
KOR
Seong Chan Hong
29 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLWLWL
Cazaux A.
6-3 6-4
Hong S.
Cazaux A.
662
Hong S.
340

Arthur Cazaux defeated Seong Chan Hong 6-3 6-4 in the Chennai CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Arthur Cazaux closed it out in two sets, 6–3 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Cazaux A.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Hong S.

Hong S.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Cazaux A.

Serve advantage — Cazaux A.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Cazaux A.Hong S.
40
Serve
—
19
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Cazaux A.Hong S.
1st serve in·Even
59%
61%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
76%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
52%
Service points won·Slight edge
66%
61%
Return points won·Even
38%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
66%
60%
Aces / match·Dominant
7.7
4.2
Double faults / match·Even
2.2
2.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (198 vs 126). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Cazaux A.Hong S.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
65
52
Break points saved·Clear edge
97
77
Break points won·Even
27
30
Deciding sets·Clear edge
87
65
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
70
80

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Cazaux A.
6.8
Slight advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Hong S.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.4
Surface form
6.7
Fatigue & Travel
7.3
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Purcell M.
Moreno De Alboran N.
5-77-626-4
Semi-finals
Purcell M.
Sweeny D.
6-47-63
Moreno De Alboran N.
Nagal S.
6-46-2
Quarter-finals
Nagal S.
Clarke J.
6-16-4
Sweeny D.
Cazaux A.
6-757-696-3
Moreno De Alboran N.
Uchiyama Y.
6-36-4
Purcell M.
Duckworth J.[2]
6-44-66-4
R16
Uchiyama Y.
Svrcina D.[7]
6-16-7106-4
Sweeny D.
Mccabe J.
6-26-1
Cazaux A.
Hong S.
6-36-4
Clarke J.
Kuzmanov D.[8]
3-66-36-4
Nagal S.
Jung J.
3-66-26-0
Moreno De Alboran N.
Tseng C.[1]
6-26-4
Purcell M.
Nouza P.
7-56-3
Duckworth J.[2]
Medjedovic H.
6-27-63
R32
Sweeny D.
Maestrelli F.
6-36-4
Duckworth J.[2]
Sanchez Jover C.
6-46-2
Uchiyama Y.
Polmans M.
6-47-65
Medjedovic H.
Borg L.
6-14-66-2
Purcell M.
Mukund S.
6-26-2
Nouza P.
Nardi L.[5]
6-47-5
Mccabe J.
Hsu Y.
6-16-4
Kuzmanov D.[8]
Ramanathan R.
6-37-63
Clarke J.
Gunneswaran P.
4-66-37-64
Jung J.
Mayot H.
6-31-67-65
Nagal S.
Peniston R.[4]
6-46-4
Svrcina D.[7]
Kachmazov A.
6-26-3
Moreno De Alboran N.
Ferreira Silva F.
6-36-2
Cazaux A.
Ly N.
6-36-2
Tseng C.[1]
Serdarusic N.
6-47-66
Hong S.
Ofner S.[3]
6-46-3