Sumit Nagal vs Ryan Peniston — Chennai CH Round of 32

Chennai CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Sumit Nagal
IND
Sumit Nagal
#241ATP
1543ELO
1476Hard ELO
28 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 13 February 2023
hard
Ryan Peniston
GBR4
Ryan Peniston
#417ATP
1441ELO
1402Hard ELO
30 yrs · 180 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLWW
Nagal S.
6-4 6-4
Peniston R.
Nagal S.
662
Peniston R.
440

Sumit Nagal defeated Ryan Peniston 6-4 6-4 in the Chennai CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Sumit Nagal edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Nagal S.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Peniston R.

Peniston R.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Nagal S.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Nagal S.Peniston R.
1st serve in·Slight edge
70%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
64%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
50%
Service points won·Even
60%
61%
Return points won·Even
42%
42%
Break points saved·Even
58%
57%
Aces / match·Slight edge
1.4
2.6
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.8
3.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 136). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Nagal S.Peniston R.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
33
20
Break points saved·Slight edge
69
60
Break points won·Slight edge
35
25
Deciding sets·Clear edge
16
36
Tiebreaks·Dominant
84
15

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Nagal S.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Peniston R.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.6+74 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.4Hard Elo 1402
5.5Overall Elo 1543
ELO gap
4.5Overall Elo 1441
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.2
Surface form
6.3
0.0
Win streak
7.03-match win streak
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
1.1
7.0
3-set count
0.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Nagal S.Peniston R.
Freshness·
96
—

Nagal S.: 8 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Purcell M.
Moreno De Alboran N.
5-77-626-4
Semi-finals
Purcell M.
Sweeny D.
6-47-63
Moreno De Alboran N.
Nagal S.
6-46-2
Quarter-finals
Nagal S.
Clarke J.
6-16-4
Sweeny D.
Cazaux A.
6-757-696-3
Moreno De Alboran N.
Uchiyama Y.
6-36-4
Purcell M.
Duckworth J.[2]
6-44-66-4
R16
Uchiyama Y.
Svrcina D.[7]
6-16-7106-4
Sweeny D.
Mccabe J.
6-26-1
Cazaux A.
Hong S.
6-36-4
Clarke J.
Kuzmanov D.[8]
3-66-36-4
Nagal S.
Jung J.
3-66-26-0
Moreno De Alboran N.
Tseng C.[1]
6-26-4
Purcell M.
Nouza P.
7-56-3
Duckworth J.[2]
Medjedovic H.
6-27-63
R32
Sweeny D.
Maestrelli F.
6-36-4
Duckworth J.[2]
Sanchez Jover C.
6-46-2
Uchiyama Y.
Polmans M.
6-47-65
Medjedovic H.
Borg L.
6-14-66-2
Purcell M.
Mukund S.
6-26-2
Nouza P.
Nardi L.[5]
6-47-5
Mccabe J.
Hsu Y.
6-16-4
Kuzmanov D.[8]
Ramanathan R.
6-37-63
Clarke J.
Gunneswaran P.
4-66-37-64
Jung J.
Mayot H.
6-31-67-65
Nagal S.
Peniston R.[4]
6-46-4
Svrcina D.[7]
Kachmazov A.
6-26-3
Moreno De Alboran N.
Ferreira Silva F.
6-36-2
Cazaux A.
Ly N.
6-36-2
Tseng C.[1]
Serdarusic N.
6-47-66
Hong S.
Ofner S.[3]
6-46-3