Arthur Cazaux vs Nam Hoang Ly — Chennai CH Round of 32

Chennai CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Arthur Cazaux
FRA
Arthur Cazaux
#98ATP
1793ELO
1738Hard ELO
$46kYTD
$2.3MCAREER
23 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 13 February 2023
hard
VIE
Nam Hoang Ly
29 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWLWLLL
Cazaux A.
6-3 6-2
Ly N.
Cazaux A.
662
Ly N.
320

Arthur Cazaux defeated Nam Hoang Ly 6-3 6-2 in the Chennai CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Cazaux A.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Ly N.

Ly N.serving75% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Cazaux A.

Serve advantage — Cazaux A.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Cazaux A.Ly N.
40
Serve
—
19
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Cazaux A.Ly N.
1st serve in·Slight edge
59%
64%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
76%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
49%
Service points won·Slight edge
66%
59%
Return points won·Even
38%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
66%
55%
Aces / match·Dominant
7.7
2.8
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.2
1.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (198 vs 26). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Cazaux A.
7.1
Strong advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Ly N.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
7.4
Surface form
5.0
Win streak
7.03-match win streak
Fatigue & Travel
7.3
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Purcell M.
Moreno De Alboran N.
5-77-626-4
Semi-finals
Purcell M.
Sweeny D.
6-47-63
Moreno De Alboran N.
Nagal S.
6-46-2
Quarter-finals
Nagal S.
Clarke J.
6-16-4
Sweeny D.
Cazaux A.
6-757-696-3
Moreno De Alboran N.
Uchiyama Y.
6-36-4
Purcell M.
Duckworth J.[2]
6-44-66-4
R16
Uchiyama Y.
Svrcina D.[7]
6-16-7106-4
Sweeny D.
Mccabe J.
6-26-1
Cazaux A.
Hong S.
6-36-4
Clarke J.
Kuzmanov D.[8]
3-66-36-4
Nagal S.
Jung J.
3-66-26-0
Moreno De Alboran N.
Tseng C.[1]
6-26-4
Purcell M.
Nouza P.
7-56-3
Duckworth J.[2]
Medjedovic H.
6-27-63
R32
Sweeny D.
Maestrelli F.
6-36-4
Duckworth J.[2]
Sanchez Jover C.
6-46-2
Uchiyama Y.
Polmans M.
6-47-65
Medjedovic H.
Borg L.
6-14-66-2
Purcell M.
Mukund S.
6-26-2
Nouza P.
Nardi L.[5]
6-47-5
Mccabe J.
Hsu Y.
6-16-4
Kuzmanov D.[8]
Ramanathan R.
6-37-63
Clarke J.
Gunneswaran P.
4-66-37-64
Jung J.
Mayot H.
6-31-67-65
Nagal S.
Peniston R.[4]
6-46-4
Svrcina D.[7]
Kachmazov A.
6-26-3
Moreno De Alboran N.
Ferreira Silva F.
6-36-2
Cazaux A.
Ly N.
6-36-2
Tseng C.[1]
Serdarusic N.
6-47-66
Hong S.
Ofner S.[3]
6-46-3