Dane Sweeny vs Arthur Cazaux — Chennai CH Quarter-final

Chennai CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
AUS
Dane Sweeny
#127ATP
1460ELO
1444Hard ELO
$256kYTD
$861kCAREER
25 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLWWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 13 February 2023
hard
Arthur Cazaux
FRA
Arthur Cazaux
#78ATP
1793ELO
1738Hard ELO
$46kYTD
$2.3MCAREER
23 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLWWLW
Sweeny D.
6-7 7-6 6-3
Cazaux A.
Sweeny D.
6571162
Cazaux A.
776931

Dane Sweeny defeated Arthur Cazaux 6-7 7-6 6-3 in the Chennai CH quarter-final on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Arthur Cazaux came in ranked #78.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Sweeny D.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Cazaux A.

Cazaux A.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Sweeny D.

Serve advantage — Cazaux A.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Sweeny D.Cazaux A.
—
Serve
40
—
Return
19

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Sweeny D.Cazaux A.
1st serve in·Even
62%
59%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
66%
76%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
52%
Service points won·Slight edge
60%
66%
Return points won·Even
39%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
58%
66%
Aces / match·Dominant
2.5
7.7
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.1
2.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (150 vs 198). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Sweeny D.Cazaux A.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
45
65
Break points saved·Dominant
69
97
Break points won·Clear edge
11
27
Deciding sets·Clear edge
68
87
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
86
70

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Sweeny D.
4.5
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
Cazaux A.
7.9
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
2.1Hard Elo 1444
Surface ELO
7.9+294 Hard Elo edge
1.8Overall Elo 1460
ELO gap
8.2Overall Elo 1793
0.0No prior meetings
H2H
10.0
2.3
Surface form
7.4
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
9.2
Minutes 14d
7.3
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Sweeny D.Cazaux A.
Freshness·
97
—

Sweeny D.: 12 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Purcell M.
Moreno De Alboran N.
5-77-626-4
Semi-finals
Purcell M.
Sweeny D.
6-47-63
Moreno De Alboran N.
Nagal S.
6-46-2
Quarter-finals
Nagal S.
Clarke J.
6-16-4
Sweeny D.
Cazaux A.
6-757-696-3
Moreno De Alboran N.
Uchiyama Y.
6-36-4
Purcell M.
Duckworth J.[2]
6-44-66-4
R16
Uchiyama Y.
Svrcina D.[7]
6-16-7106-4
Sweeny D.
Mccabe J.
6-26-1
Cazaux A.
Hong S.
6-36-4
Clarke J.
Kuzmanov D.[8]
3-66-36-4
Nagal S.
Jung J.
3-66-26-0
Moreno De Alboran N.
Tseng C.[1]
6-26-4
Purcell M.
Nouza P.
7-56-3
Duckworth J.[2]
Medjedovic H.
6-27-63
R32
Sweeny D.
Maestrelli F.
6-36-4
Duckworth J.[2]
Sanchez Jover C.
6-46-2
Uchiyama Y.
Polmans M.
6-47-65
Medjedovic H.
Borg L.
6-14-66-2
Purcell M.
Mukund S.
6-26-2
Nouza P.
Nardi L.[5]
6-47-5
Mccabe J.
Hsu Y.
6-16-4
Kuzmanov D.[8]
Ramanathan R.
6-37-63
Clarke J.
Gunneswaran P.
4-66-37-64
Jung J.
Mayot H.
6-31-67-65
Nagal S.
Peniston R.[4]
6-46-4
Svrcina D.[7]
Kachmazov A.
6-26-3
Moreno De Alboran N.
Ferreira Silva F.
6-36-2
Cazaux A.
Ly N.
6-36-2
Tseng C.[1]
Serdarusic N.
6-47-66
Hong S.
Ofner S.[3]
6-46-3