Dennis Novak vs Marek Gengel — Nonthaburi 2 CH Quarter-final

Nonthaburi 2 CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
AUT1
Dennis Novak
#818ATP
32 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 9 January 2023
hard
Marek Gengel
CZE
Marek Gengel
#373ATP
1411ELO
1377Hard ELO
30 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWWLWWW
Novak D.
6-3 6-3
Gengel M.
Novak D.
662
Gengel M.
330

Dennis Novak defeated Marek Gengel 6-3 6-3 in the Nonthaburi 2 CH quarter-final on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Novak D.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Gengel M.

Gengel M.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Novak D.

Serve advantage — Novak D.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Novak D.Gengel M.
1st serve in·Even
65%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
46%
Service points won·Even
62%
60%
Return points won·Even
41%
37%
Break points saved·Even
59%
57%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.3
5.0
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.2
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (126 vs 88). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Novak D.Gengel M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
36
11
Break points saved·Dominant
80
35
Break points won·Slight edge
15
10
Deciding sets·Clear edge
33
54
Tiebreaks·Dominant
77
4

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Novak D.
7.1
Strong advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Gengel M.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
7.1
Surface form
6.8
9.06-match win streak
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
5.8
Minutes 14d
6.7
7.0
3-set count
4.0
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Cazaux A.
Harris L.[2]
7-656-2
Semi-finals
Cazaux A.
Novak D.[1]
6-44-66-2
Harris L.[2]
Jung J.
6-16-4
Quarter-finals
Jung J.
Donskoy E.
4-67-56-3
Harris L.[2]
Michalski D.[6]
6-46-3
Cazaux A.
Sandgren T.[8]
6-36-3
Novak D.[1]
Gengel M.
6-36-3
R16
Harris L.[2]
Moraing M.
6-16-3
Jung J.
Zhukayev B.
6-47-63
Sandgren T.[8]
Hassan B.
6-31-67-66
Donskoy E.
Uchiyama Y.
6-47-63
Michalski D.[6]
Travaglia S.
7-647-68
Novak D.[1]
Royer V.
6-26-3
Gengel M.
Geerts M.[5]
2-67-607-5
Cazaux A.
Gunneswaran P.
6-757-646-3
R32
Zhukayev B.
Trongcharoenchaikul W.
7-627-65
Royer V.
Harris B.
6-10-0
Harris L.[2]
Samrej K.
6-16-2
Moraing M.
Mukund S.
6-46-4
Travaglia S.
Arnaboldi A.
6-757-56-3
Donskoy E.
Yevseyev D.
6-47-61
Jung J.
Shimabukuro S.[7]
6-46-1
Hassan B.
Ayeni O.
7-57-5
Gunneswaran P.
Kolar Z.[4]
6-36-3
Geerts M.[5]
Kovapitukted P.
6-16-3
Gengel M.
Moriya H.
6-16-2
Novak D.[1]
Squire H.
6-37-67
Uchiyama Y.
Zuk K.[3]
6-26-1
Cazaux A.
Fonio G.
6-46-4
Sandgren T.[8]
Added D.
2-67-626-4
Michalski D.[6]
Mochizuki S.
3-67-56-3