Arthur Cazaux vs Lloyd Harris — Nonthaburi 2 CH Final

Nonthaburi 2 CH · CHALLENGER · Final
Arthur Cazaux
FRA
Arthur Cazaux
#98ATP
1793ELO
1738Hard ELO
$46kYTD
$2.3MCAREER
23 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 9 January 2023
hard
Lloyd Harris
RSA2
Lloyd Harris
#187ATP
1665ELO
1640Hard ELO
$130kYTD
$4.7MCAREER
29 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWWLL
Cazaux A.
7-6 6-2
Harris L.
Cazaux A.
7762
Harris L.
6520

Arthur Cazaux defeated Lloyd Harris 7-6 6-2 in the Nonthaburi 2 CH final on hard. The result followed the form book — Arthur Cazaux came in ranked #98, defending the title.

Key context

  • Match story: Arthur Cazaux closed it out in two sets, 7–6 6–2.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Cazaux A.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Harris L.

Harris L.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Cazaux A.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Cazaux A.Harris L.
40
Serve
—
19
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Cazaux A.Harris L.
1st serve in·Slight edge
59%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
75%
77%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
50%
Service points won·Even
66%
67%
Return points won·Even
38%
37%
Break points saved·Even
66%
64%
Aces / match·Dominant
7.7
11.5
Double faults / match·Even
2.2
2.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (198 vs 154). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Cazaux A.Harris L.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
65
57
Break points saved·Even
97
95
Break points won·Even
27
24
Deciding sets·Slight edge
87
94
Tiebreaks·Dominant
70
24

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Cazaux A.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 56 days (−0.7)
Harris L.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.1+97 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.9Hard Elo 1640
6.4Overall Elo 1793
ELO gap
3.6Overall Elo 1665
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.8
Surface form
7.2
0.0
Win streak
7.03-match win streak
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
5.5
3-set count
4.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Cazaux A.
Harris L.[2]
7-656-2
Semi-finals
Cazaux A.
Novak D.[1]
6-44-66-2
Harris L.[2]
Jung J.
6-16-4
Quarter-finals
Jung J.
Donskoy E.
4-67-56-3
Harris L.[2]
Michalski D.[6]
6-46-3
Cazaux A.
Sandgren T.[8]
6-36-3
Novak D.[1]
Gengel M.
6-36-3
R16
Harris L.[2]
Moraing M.
6-16-3
Jung J.
Zhukayev B.
6-47-63
Sandgren T.[8]
Hassan B.
6-31-67-66
Donskoy E.
Uchiyama Y.
6-47-63
Michalski D.[6]
Travaglia S.
7-647-68
Novak D.[1]
Royer V.
6-26-3
Gengel M.
Geerts M.[5]
2-67-607-5
Cazaux A.
Gunneswaran P.
6-757-646-3
R32
Zhukayev B.
Trongcharoenchaikul W.
7-627-65
Royer V.
Harris B.
6-10-0
Harris L.[2]
Samrej K.
6-16-2
Moraing M.
Mukund S.
6-46-4
Travaglia S.
Arnaboldi A.
6-757-56-3
Donskoy E.
Yevseyev D.
6-47-61
Jung J.
Shimabukuro S.[7]
6-46-1
Hassan B.
Ayeni O.
7-57-5
Gunneswaran P.
Kolar Z.[4]
6-36-3
Geerts M.[5]
Kovapitukted P.
6-16-3
Gengel M.
Moriya H.
6-16-2
Novak D.[1]
Squire H.
6-37-67
Uchiyama Y.
Zuk K.[3]
6-26-1
Cazaux A.
Fonio G.
6-46-4
Sandgren T.[8]
Added D.
2-67-626-4
Michalski D.[6]
Mochizuki S.
3-67-56-3