Lloyd Harris vs Kasidit Samrej — Nonthaburi 2 CH Round of 32

Nonthaburi 2 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Lloyd Harris
RSA2
Lloyd Harris
#187ATP
1665ELO
1640Hard ELO
$130kYTD
$4.7MCAREER
29 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWWLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 9 January 2023
hard
THA
Kasidit Samrej
#395ATP
1285ELO
1260Hard ELO
25 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLWWLW
Harris L.
6-1 6-2
Samrej K.
Harris L.
662
Samrej K.
120

Lloyd Harris defeated Kasidit Samrej 6-1 6-2 in the Nonthaburi 2 CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Harris L.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Samrej K.

Samrej K.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Harris L.

Serve advantage — Harris L.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Harris L.Samrej K.
1st serve in·Slight edge
64%
58%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
77%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
48%
Service points won·Slight edge
67%
62%
Return points won·Even
37%
38%
Break points saved·Even
64%
63%
Aces / match·Dominant
11.5
5.7
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.1
4.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (154 vs 78). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Harris L.
7.7
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Samrej K.
5.3
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
9.9+380 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
0.1Hard Elo 1260
10.0Overall Elo 1665
ELO gap
0.0Overall Elo 1285
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.2
Surface form
6.0
7.03-match win streak
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
5.5
Minutes 14d
9.2
4.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Cazaux A.
Harris L.[2]
7-656-2
Semi-finals
Cazaux A.
Novak D.[1]
6-44-66-2
Harris L.[2]
Jung J.
6-16-4
Quarter-finals
Jung J.
Donskoy E.
4-67-56-3
Harris L.[2]
Michalski D.[6]
6-46-3
Cazaux A.
Sandgren T.[8]
6-36-3
Novak D.[1]
Gengel M.
6-36-3
R16
Harris L.[2]
Moraing M.
6-16-3
Jung J.
Zhukayev B.
6-47-63
Sandgren T.[8]
Hassan B.
6-31-67-66
Donskoy E.
Uchiyama Y.
6-47-63
Michalski D.[6]
Travaglia S.
7-647-68
Novak D.[1]
Royer V.
6-26-3
Gengel M.
Geerts M.[5]
2-67-607-5
Cazaux A.
Gunneswaran P.
6-757-646-3
R32
Zhukayev B.
Trongcharoenchaikul W.
7-627-65
Royer V.
Harris B.
6-10-0
Harris L.[2]
Samrej K.
6-16-2
Moraing M.
Mukund S.
6-46-4
Travaglia S.
Arnaboldi A.
6-757-56-3
Donskoy E.
Yevseyev D.
6-47-61
Jung J.
Shimabukuro S.[7]
6-46-1
Hassan B.
Ayeni O.
7-57-5
Gunneswaran P.
Kolar Z.[4]
6-36-3
Geerts M.[5]
Kovapitukted P.
6-16-3
Gengel M.
Moriya H.
6-16-2
Novak D.[1]
Squire H.
6-37-67
Uchiyama Y.
Zuk K.[3]
6-26-1
Cazaux A.
Fonio G.
6-46-4
Sandgren T.[8]
Added D.
2-67-626-4
Michalski D.[6]
Mochizuki S.
3-67-56-3