Beibit Zhukayev vs Wishaya Trongcharoenchaikul — Nonthaburi 2 CH Round of 32

Nonthaburi 2 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
KAZ
Beibit Zhukayev
#387ATP
1455ELO
1402Hard ELO
25 yrs · 198 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLWLWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 9 January 2023
hard
THA
Wishaya Trongcharoenchaikul
#965ATP
31 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLLLWL
Zhukayev B.
7-6 7-6
Trongcharoenchaikul W.
Zhukayev B.
77772
Trongcharoenchaikul W.
62650

Beibit Zhukayev defeated Wishaya Trongcharoenchaikul 7-6 7-6 in the Nonthaburi 2 CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Beibit Zhukayev came in ranked #387, defending last year's semi-final.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Zhukayev B.serving93% hold

wins 73% of points on serve vs Trongcharoenchaikul W.

Trongcharoenchaikul W.serving87% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Zhukayev B.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Zhukayev B.Trongcharoenchaikul W.
1st serve in·Even
61%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
77%
71%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
50%
45%
Service points won·Slight edge
66%
61%
Return points won·Even
33%
32%
Break points saved·Slight edge
66%
57%
Aces / match·Dominant
10.9
5.5
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.6
3.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 30). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Zhukayev B.Trongcharoenchaikul W.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
31
12
Break points saved·Dominant
94
43
Break points won·Even
1
3
Deciding sets·Dominant
25
52
Tiebreaks·Dominant
63
11

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Zhukayev B.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Trongcharoenchaikul W.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.9
Surface form
1.6
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0Lost last 6
Fatigue & Travel
8.7
Minutes 14d
9.3
7.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Cazaux A.
Harris L.[2]
7-656-2
Semi-finals
Cazaux A.
Novak D.[1]
6-44-66-2
Harris L.[2]
Jung J.
6-16-4
Quarter-finals
Jung J.
Donskoy E.
4-67-56-3
Harris L.[2]
Michalski D.[6]
6-46-3
Cazaux A.
Sandgren T.[8]
6-36-3
Novak D.[1]
Gengel M.
6-36-3
R16
Harris L.[2]
Moraing M.
6-16-3
Jung J.
Zhukayev B.
6-47-63
Sandgren T.[8]
Hassan B.
6-31-67-66
Donskoy E.
Uchiyama Y.
6-47-63
Michalski D.[6]
Travaglia S.
7-647-68
Novak D.[1]
Royer V.
6-26-3
Gengel M.
Geerts M.[5]
2-67-607-5
Cazaux A.
Gunneswaran P.
6-757-646-3
R32
Zhukayev B.
Trongcharoenchaikul W.
7-627-65
Royer V.
Harris B.
6-10-0
Harris L.[2]
Samrej K.
6-16-2
Moraing M.
Mukund S.
6-46-4
Travaglia S.
Arnaboldi A.
6-757-56-3
Donskoy E.
Yevseyev D.
6-47-61
Jung J.
Shimabukuro S.[7]
6-46-1
Hassan B.
Ayeni O.
7-57-5
Gunneswaran P.
Kolar Z.[4]
6-36-3
Geerts M.[5]
Kovapitukted P.
6-16-3
Gengel M.
Moriya H.
6-16-2
Novak D.[1]
Squire H.
6-37-67
Uchiyama Y.
Zuk K.[3]
6-26-1
Cazaux A.
Fonio G.
6-46-4
Sandgren T.[8]
Added D.
2-67-626-4
Michalski D.[6]
Mochizuki S.
3-67-56-3