Mats Moraing vs Sasi Kumar Mukund — Nonthaburi 2 CH Round of 32

Nonthaburi 2 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
GER
Mats Moraing
34 yrs · 198 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 9 January 2023
hard
IND
Sasi Kumar Mukund
1306ELO
1281Hard ELO
29 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLWLLL
Moraing M.
6-4 6-4
Mukund S.
Moraing M.
662
Mukund S.
440

Mats Moraing defeated Sasi Kumar Mukund 6-4 6-4 in the Nonthaburi 2 CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Mats Moraing edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Moraing M.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Mukund S.

Mukund S.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Moraing M.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Moraing M.Mukund S.
1st serve in·Even
56%
59%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
75%
70%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
43%
49%
Service points won·Even
61%
61%
Return points won·Even
38%
36%
Break points saved·Even
60%
57%
Aces / match·Clear edge
8.2
6.4
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.5
2.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (21 vs 94). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Moraing M.Mukund S.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
40
0
Break points saved·Dominant
86
20
Break points won·Clear edge
18
5
Deciding sets·Dominant
66
13
Tiebreaks·Dominant
18
56

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Moraing M.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Mukund S.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
2.8
Surface form
4.7
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
7.7
Minutes 14d
9.0
7.0
3-set count
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Cazaux A.
Harris L.[2]
7-656-2
Semi-finals
Cazaux A.
Novak D.[1]
6-44-66-2
Harris L.[2]
Jung J.
6-16-4
Quarter-finals
Jung J.
Donskoy E.
4-67-56-3
Harris L.[2]
Michalski D.[6]
6-46-3
Cazaux A.
Sandgren T.[8]
6-36-3
Novak D.[1]
Gengel M.
6-36-3
R16
Harris L.[2]
Moraing M.
6-16-3
Jung J.
Zhukayev B.
6-47-63
Sandgren T.[8]
Hassan B.
6-31-67-66
Donskoy E.
Uchiyama Y.
6-47-63
Michalski D.[6]
Travaglia S.
7-647-68
Novak D.[1]
Royer V.
6-26-3
Gengel M.
Geerts M.[5]
2-67-607-5
Cazaux A.
Gunneswaran P.
6-757-646-3
R32
Zhukayev B.
Trongcharoenchaikul W.
7-627-65
Royer V.
Harris B.
6-10-0
Harris L.[2]
Samrej K.
6-16-2
Moraing M.
Mukund S.
6-46-4
Travaglia S.
Arnaboldi A.
6-757-56-3
Donskoy E.
Yevseyev D.
6-47-61
Jung J.
Shimabukuro S.[7]
6-46-1
Hassan B.
Ayeni O.
7-57-5
Gunneswaran P.
Kolar Z.[4]
6-36-3
Geerts M.[5]
Kovapitukted P.
6-16-3
Gengel M.
Moriya H.
6-16-2
Novak D.[1]
Squire H.
6-37-67
Uchiyama Y.
Zuk K.[3]
6-26-1
Cazaux A.
Fonio G.
6-46-4
Sandgren T.[8]
Added D.
2-67-626-4
Michalski D.[6]
Mochizuki S.
3-67-56-3