Taylor Fritz vs Alexander Bublik — Eastbourne Quarter-final

Eastbourne · ATP · Quarter-final
Taylor Fritz
USA3
Taylor Fritz
#7ATP
1909ELO
1857Grass ELO
$1.6MYTD
$31MCAREER
28 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLWWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 20 June 2022
grass
Alexander Bublik
KAZ
Alexander Bublik
#11ATP
1889ELO
1802Grass ELO
$1.2MYTD
$12MCAREER
29 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLWWLL
Fritz T.
6-3 6-2
Bublik A.
Fritz T.
662
Bublik A.
320

Taylor Fritz defeated Alexander Bublik 6-3 6-2 in the Eastbourne quarter-final on grass. The result followed the form book — Taylor Fritz came in ranked #7. Taylor Fritz extended the head-to-head to 5–4.

Key context

Head to head

4–4
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2026-07-06WimbledonR16grassTaylor Fritz7.7-6.1 6-4 6-4
2026-06-13StuttgartSFgrassTaylor Fritz4-6 4-6
2025-10-27Paris MastersR16hardAlexander Bublik7-6(5) 6-2
2024-07-29Paris OlympicsR64clayTaylor Fritz6-4 6-4
2022-09-15Davis Cup Finals RR: USA vs KAZRRhardTaylor Fritz7-6(6) 1-6 6-3
2021-03-22Miami MastersR16hardAlexander Bublik6-7(5) 6-3 6-4
2020-01-13AdelaideR32hardAlexander Bublik6-4 7-6(4)
2019-09-23ChengduR32hardAlexander Bublik4-6 7-5 7-5
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Fritz T.serving96% hold

wins 77% of points on serve vs Bublik A.

Bublik A.serving91% hold

wins 71% of points on serve vs Fritz T.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Fritz T.Bublik A.
1st serve in·Even
63%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
79%
77%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
55%
46%
Service points won·Slight edge
70%
65%
Return points won·Even
36%
35%
Break points saved·Slight edge
69%
64%
Aces / match·Even
11.5
11.1
Double faults / match·Dominant
1.9
5.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Fritz T.Bublik A.
Clutch Rating·Even
87
88
Break points saved·Even
100
99
Break points won·Slight edge
60
67
Deciding sets·Even
98
99
Tiebreaks·Even
99
96

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Fritz T.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Bublik A.
4.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
6.0+55 Grass Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.0Grass Elo 1802
5.7Overall Elo 1909
ELO gap
4.3Overall Elo 1889
5.0
H2H
5.0
5.2
Surface form
5.9
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
7.9
Minutes 14d
6.7
7.0
3-set count
9.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
7.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Fritz T.Bublik A.
Freshness·Even
63
66

Fritz T.: 3 days rest · 3 matches, 103 games (7d) · Bublik A.: 5 days rest · 2 matches, 88 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Fritz T.[3]
Cressy M.
6-26-747-64
Semi-finals
Fritz T.[3]
De Minaur A.[6]
6-16-756-3
Cressy M.
Draper J.
7-656-726-3
Quarter-finals
Cressy M.
Norrie C.[1]
7-57-5
De Minaur A.[6]
Paul T.
6-24-66-4
Draper J.
Peniston R.
6-36-3
Fritz T.[3]
Bublik A.
6-36-2
R16
Norrie C.[1]
Nakashima B.
6-46-2
Bublik A.
Millman J.
6-46-2
De Minaur A.[6]
Sonego L.
7-636-2
Paul T.
Sinner J.[2]
6-33-66-3
Fritz T.[3]
Monteiro T.
7-56-3
Cressy M.
Evans D.
7-626-4
Peniston R.
Martinez P.
7-683-66-3
Draper J.
Schwartzman D.[4]
7-57-63
R32
Martinez P.
Davidovich Fokina A.
1-67-660-0
Nakashima B.
Clarke J.
6-16-3
Peniston R.
Rune H.[8]
4-67-656-1
Monteiro T.
Humbert U.
6-726-36-4
Paul T.
Cerundolo F.
4-67-626-4
Sonego L.
Duckworth J.
4-67-657-61
De Minaur A.[6]
Garin C.
6-36-3
Bublik A.
Tiafoe F.[7]
5-77-646-0
Evans D.
Mannarino A.
6-46-3
Millman J.
Korda S.
6-37-65
Draper J.
Brooksby J.
6-26-2
Cressy M.
Opelka R.[5]
6-36-1