Alexander Bublik vs Taylor Fritz — Chengdu Round of 32

Chengdu · ATP · Round of 32
Alexander Bublik
KAZ
Alexander Bublik
#11ATP
1889ELO
1837Hard ELO
$1.2MYTD
$12MCAREER
29 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLWWLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 23 September 2019
hard
Taylor Fritz
USA6
Taylor Fritz
#7ATP
1909ELO
1839Hard ELO
$1.6MYTD
$31MCAREER
28 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLWWWW
Bublik A.
4-6 7-5 7-5
Fritz T.
Bublik A.
4772
Fritz T.
6551

Alexander Bublik defeated Taylor Fritz 4-6 7-5 7-5 in the Chengdu round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Taylor Fritz came in ranked #7, leading the head-to-head 5–3, defending last year's semi-final. Alexander Bublik narrowed the head-to-head to 5–4.

Key context

Head to head

3–5
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2026-07-06WimbledonR16grassTaylor Fritz7.7-6.1 6-4 6-4
2026-06-13StuttgartSFgrassTaylor Fritz4-6 4-6
2025-10-27Paris MastersR16hardAlexander Bublik7-6(5) 6-2
2024-07-29Paris OlympicsR64clayTaylor Fritz6-4 6-4
2022-09-15Davis Cup Finals RR: USA vs KAZRRhardTaylor Fritz7-6(6) 1-6 6-3
2022-06-20EastbourneQFgrassTaylor Fritz6-3 6-2
2021-03-22Miami MastersR16hardAlexander Bublik6-7(5) 6-3 6-4
2020-01-13AdelaideR32hardAlexander Bublik6-4 7-6(4)
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Bublik A.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Fritz T.

Fritz T.serving94% hold

wins 74% of points on serve vs Bublik A.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Bublik A.Fritz T.
65
Serve
76
25
Return
32

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Bublik A.Fritz T.
1st serve in·Even
61%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
77%
79%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
46%
55%
Service points won·Slight edge
65%
70%
Return points won·Even
35%
36%
Break points saved·Slight edge
64%
69%
Aces / match·Even
11.1
11.5
Double faults / match·Dominant
5.8
1.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Bublik A.Fritz T.
Clutch Rating·Even
88
87
Break points saved·Even
99
100
Break points won·Slight edge
67
60
Deciding sets·Even
99
98
Tiebreaks·Even
96
99

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Bublik A.Fritz T.
Freshness·Even
66
63

Bublik A.: 5 days rest · 2 matches, 88 games (7d) · Fritz T.: 3 days rest · 3 matches, 103 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Carreno Busta P.
Bublik A.
6-756-47-63
Semi-finals
Bublik A.
Harris L.
7-666-4
Carreno Busta P.
Shapovalov D.[8]
6-36-4
Quarter-finals
Shapovalov D.[8]
Gerasimov E.
6-43-66-3
Carreno Busta P.
Garin C.
7-56-2
Bublik A.
Dimitrov G.[4]
5-77-697-63
Harris L.
Sousa J.
6-756-36-4
R16
Dimitrov G.[4]
Evans D.
7-57-5
Carreno Busta P.
Paire B.[3]
6-33-66-3
Harris L.
Lajovic D.[5]
6-36-3
Garin C.
Verdasco F.
6-33-66-3
Shapovalov D.[8]
Klahn B.
3-66-37-63
Bublik A.
Thompson J.
6-47-5
Gerasimov E.
Isner J.[1]
6-7117-657-64
Sousa J.
Auger Aliassime F.[2]
6-46-756-4
R32
Carreno Busta P.
Albot R.
6-36-4
Sousa J.
Chung H.
1-66-36-4
Shapovalov D.[8]
Berankis R.
6-46-3
Verdasco F.
Popyrin A.
6-27-5
Bublik A.
Fritz T.[6]
4-67-57-5
Thompson J.
Pospisil V.
6-33-67-5
Lajovic D.[5]
Londero J.
6-24-66-4
Harris L.
Fucsovics M.
4-66-46-2
Gerasimov E.
Li Z.
4-66-26-3
Evans D.
Bai Y.
6-34-67-64
Klahn B.
Jung J.
4-66-37-62
Garin C.
Edmund K.[7]
6-36-2