Clement Chidekh vs Charles Broom — Glasgow CH Quarter-final

Glasgow CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
FRA2
Clement Chidekh
#205ATP
1513ELO
1523Hard ELO
$92kYTD
$401kCAREER
25 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWLLLLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 12 January 2026
hard
GBR
Charles Broom
#285ATP
1409ELO
1396Hard ELO
28 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWWLLW
Chidekh C.
6-4 6-3
Broom C.
Chidekh C.
662
Broom C.
430

Clement Chidekh defeated Charles Broom 6-4 6-3 in the Glasgow CH quarter-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Clement Chidekh came in ranked #205, defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Chidekh C.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Broom C.

Broom C.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Chidekh C.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Chidekh C.Broom C.
1st serve in·Even
64%
63%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
70%
77%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
54%
Service points won·Slight edge
63%
68%
Return points won·Even
42%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
60%
66%
Aces / match·Dominant
3.5
8.5
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.0
1.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (34 vs 17). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Chidekh C.Broom C.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
32
12
Break points saved·Dominant
83
56
Break points won·Slight edge
9
0
Deciding sets·Clear edge
59
42
Tiebreaks·Even
12
10

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Chidekh C.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Broom C.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.8+127 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.2Hard Elo 1396
6.7Overall Elo 1513
ELO gap
3.3Overall Elo 1409
0.0No prior meetings
H2H
10.0
3.5
Surface form
5.7
10.010-match win streak
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
4.3
Minutes 14d
7.6
0.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
7.0
Surface transition
7.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Chidekh C.Broom C.
Freshness·
65
—

Chidekh C.: 1 day rest · 4 matches, 84 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Chidekh C.[2]
Kukushkin M.
5-76-14-0
Semi-finals
Kukushkin M.
Barton H.
6-47-64
Chidekh C.[2]
Gombos N.
6-36-786-4
Quarter-finals
Barton H.
Monday J.[1]
7-626-3
Chidekh C.[2]
Broom C.
6-46-3
Kukushkin M.
Gentzsch T.
6-26-4
Gombos N.
Broady L.
6-23-66-1
R16
Monday J.[1]
Gray A.
7-637-63
Kukushkin M.
Bertola R.[3]
6-16-2
Gentzsch T.
Moeller M.
7-56-2
Barton H.
Yevseyev D.
6-26-2
Chidekh C.[2]
Masur D.
7-655-77-60
Gombos N.
Wendelken H.
6-37-65
Broady L.
Kuzmanov D.[4]
7-636-766-2
Broom C.
Squire H.[8]
6-47-66
R32
Bertola R.[3]
Kopp S.
4-66-37-62
Kukushkin M.
Soriano Barrera A.
6-27-65
Moeller M.
Ferreira Silva F.[5]
6-31-0
Gombos N.
Butvilas E.[7]
7-53-66-3
Masur D.
Karol M.
7-697-64
Chidekh C.[2]
Searle H.
7-676-4
Yevseyev D.
Pereira T.[6]
6-46-2
Gentzsch T.
Overbeck C.
7-626-2
Monday J.[1]
Krumich M.
6-36-736-3
Gray A.
Hussey G.
6-36-4
Wendelken H.
Kozlov S.
6-13-66-4
Broady L.
Damas M.
6-06-0
Kuzmanov D.[4]
Jubb P.
6-26-3
Squire H.[8]
Maxted L.
6-13-66-3
Broom C.
Negritu C.
6-736-47-63
Barton H.
Erhard M.
7-6126-2